H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Hank Pfister vs Ray Ruffels H2H: 3-1
Hank Pfister holds a 3–1 lead over Ray Ruffels in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Hank Pfister leads 2–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Hank Pfister won the 1977 Perth fourth round 6-3 5-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 80
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 1977* | Perth | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Hank Pfister | 6-3 5-7 6-2 | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
| Jan 12, 1977* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Hank Pfister | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
| Dec 30, 1976* | Sydney Outdoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Hank Pfister | 4-6 7-6 7-5 | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
| Oct 28, 1976* | Perth | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Ray Ruffels | 6-4 6-3 | Hank Pfister | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hank Pfister | #982 | #19 | 0 | 1,926 | 260 | 213 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ray Ruffels | #482 | #27 | 0 | 1,903 | 246 | 207 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hank Pfister | Ray Ruffels | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1975 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1976 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 41–19 | 68.3% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1977 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #48 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 35–21 | 62.5% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1978 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #29 | 1,839 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 35–22 | 61.4% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1979 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #30 | 1,841 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 32–32 | 50.0% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1980 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1981 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,773 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1982 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #76 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1983 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #41 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #112 | 1,692 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1984 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #86 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,782 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1985 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #68 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,699 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,617 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #595 | 1,677 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,544 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #980 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #482 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 |