H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Hans Kary vs Ray Ruffels H2H: 1-2
Ray Ruffels holds a 2–1 lead over Hans Kary in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Ray Ruffels leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Hans Kary won the 1976 Boston third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 77
Left-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 80
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 1976* | Boston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Hans Kary | 6-4 6-4 | Ray Ruffels | Match data |
| Apr 11, 1974* | Monte Carlo Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ray Ruffels | 6-2 7-5 | Hans Kary | Match data |
| Jun 16, 1971* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Ray Ruffels | 6-1 7-5 | Hans Kary | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hans Kary | #627 | #54 | 0 | 1,772 | 150 | 216 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ray Ruffels | #482 | #27 | 0 | 1,903 | 246 | 207 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hans Kary | Ray Ruffels | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1970 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1971 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 41–19 | 68.3% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1972 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 35–21 | 62.5% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1973 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #85 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 35–22 | 61.4% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1974 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #81 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 32–32 | 50.0% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1975 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #84 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1976 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #70 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,773 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1977 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #105 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #76 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1978 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #192 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #112 | 1,692 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1979 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #93 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,782 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1980 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #143 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,699 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 1981 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,617 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 1982 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,471 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,544 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #482 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 |