H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Illya Marchenko vs Daniel Brands H2H: 0-1

Daniel Brands holds a 1–0 lead over Illya Marchenko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Brands leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Brands won the 2010 Bangkok round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Illya Marchenko
Ukraine Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Daniel Brands
GER Age 39 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Brands #81 6-3 6-4 Illya Marchenko #74 Match data Sep 30, 2010* R32 Bangkok ATP 250 Hard
Illya Marchenko #199 3-6 7-5 6-4 Daniel Brands #126 Match data Sep 1, 2009* Q2 Q US Open Grand Slam Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Illya Marchenko #1,347 #49 905 1,805 50 83 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daniel Brands #1,055 #51 896 1,886 58 93 38.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Illya Marchenko Daniel Brands
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2007 1–1 50.0% #220 1,491 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2008 1–4 20.0% #150 1,539 0 0
21 2009 4–3 57.1% #120 1,638 0 0 2009 7–5 58.3% #92 1,645 0 0
22 2010 17–21 44.7% #81 1,715 0 0 2010 9–19 32.1% #104 1,670 0 0
23 2011 5–9 35.7% #229 1,554 0 0 2011 4–11 26.7% #110 1,690 0 0
24 2012 0–1 0.0% #140 1,565 0 0 2012 5–8 38.5% #153 1,688 0 0
25 2013 0–4 0.0% #165 1,517 0 0 2013 23–23 50.0% #54 1,809 0 0
26 2014 2–4 33.3% #143 1,645 0 0 2014 2–11 15.4% #329 1,713 0 0
27 2015 3–7 30.0% #94 1,738 0 0 2015 2–1 66.7% #159 1,729 0 0
28 2016 14–20 41.2% #74 1,699 0 0 2016 2–4 33.3% #168 1,660 0 0
29 2017 2–6 25.0% #196 1,669 0 0 2017 1–4 20.0% #320 1,664 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2018 0–1 0.0% #182 1,616 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2019 1–1 50.0% #465 1,605 0 0
32 2020 0–1 0.0% #215 1,554 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2021 3–6 33.3% #163 1,639 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2023 0–1 0.0% #220 1,570 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Illya Marchenko Daniel Brands
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
21 2009 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2010 14 15 29 48.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
23 2011 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2011 4 5 9 44.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 2 4 6 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
25 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 11 12 23 47.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 2014 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2015 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2015 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
28 2016 12 14 26 46.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2016 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2017 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2017 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 41 57 98 41.8% 3 10 13 23.1% 6 16 22 27.3% — 30 49 79 38.0% 21 34 55 38.2% 7 10 17 41.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 131/133 of Illya Marchenko's and 151/151 of Daniel Brands's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Illya Marchenko Daniel Brands
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 7.5 2.0 64.3% 87.8% 59.9% 100.0% 16.7% 77.8% 23.5%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 5/5 8.0 4.4 61.7% 75.9% 40.5% 48.6% 34.2% 63.2% 30.6%
21 2009 7/7 1.7 3.3 57.3% 70.2% 48.5% 48.6% 52.6% 61.0% 36.3% 2009 12/12 8.3 3.3 67.9% 76.6% 51.4% 69.8% 37.8% 68.6% 34.8%
22 2010 37/38 3.7 3.6 59.0% 69.8% 47.9% 57.7% 40.9% 60.7% 38.7% 2010 28/28 9.3 3.0 64.5% 69.9% 53.9% 57.0% 31.5% 63.9% 29.5%
23 2011 14/14 4.3 4.1 56.5% 67.2% 49.3% 50.4% 40.9% 59.3% 39.2% 2011 15/15 7.0 3.0 68.7% 68.6% 47.4% 57.3% 31.0% 61.7% 28.0%
24 2012 1/1 2.0 18.0 55.1% 68.0% 43.0% 68.4% 30.8% 56.8% 38.7% 2012 13/13 11.1 3.8 63.0% 76.4% 48.5% 49.4% 35.6% 66.2% 31.8%
25 2013 4/4 3.3 6.3 58.2% 66.7% 42.9% 50.6% 40.0% 56.4% 34.2% 2013 46/46 8.5 2.2 66.8% 72.9% 53.0% 57.6% 35.3% 66.2% 33.4%
26 2014 6/6 8.3 5.3 60.7% 71.2% 48.9% 57.2% 28.9% 62.4% 34.7% 2014 13/13 9.2 1.8 69.7% 68.9% 50.3% 62.1% 22.8% 62.9% 29.5%
27 2015 10/10 6.2 3.8 58.4% 73.5% 50.1% 61.7% 35.0% 63.7% 31.7% 2015 3/3 7.3 3.3 54.4% 75.4% 62.8% 43.8% 27.8% 71.2% 37.0%
28 2016 33/34 5.1 4.5 56.8% 72.8% 46.5% 59.1% 45.8% 61.2% 33.9% 2016 6/6 12.3 5.0 64.1% 72.7% 51.2% 59.5% 53.3% 64.7% 32.0%
29 2017 8/8 7.0 3.6 58.7% 75.7% 48.5% 39.7% 30.2% 63.8% 36.1% 2017 5/5 7.0 5.2 64.9% 70.4% 41.0% 62.4% 23.2% 59.4% 29.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 1/1 13.0 4.0 71.7% 70.4% 64.3% 66.7% 0.0% 68.7% 28.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 2/2 8.0 3.0 66.9% 67.0% 55.3% 66.7% 43.8% 63.0% 35.5%
32 2020 1/1 4.0 4.0 67.0% 63.4% 60.0% 57.1% 20.0% 62.3% 31.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 9/9 6.3 3.1 58.2% 71.9% 56.1% 42.5% 37.6% 65.4% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1/1 2.0 3.0 50.7% 58.3% 48.6% 40.0% 30.8% 53.5% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 131/133 4.8 4.1 58.0% 70.9% 48.4% 54.7% 40.5% 61.3% 36.0% — 151/151 8.8 3.0 66.0% 72.3% 51.4% 58.5% 33.1% 65.1% 31.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Illya Marchenko Daniel Brands
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2007 1502 97.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1492 106.0 -2.82 -3.49 1.057 51.7% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
20 2008 1508 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1540 111.5 -1.86 -1.37 0.830 46.7% — +37 — 25.0% -1.50 0–1 — — +0.09
21 2009 1639 117.6 -1.58 -1.13 0.931 49.0% +29 — — 46.7% -0.40 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.62 2009 1645 119.5 +2.51 -1.77 1.108 51.4% — +44 — 53.3% +0.30 3–3 (50%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.22
22 2010 1715 132.0 -2.67 +1.26 0.984 49.7% +28 -198 -106 43.5% -0.58 5–7 (42%) 8–4 (67%) — +0.30 2010 1671 129.6 +0.41 -4.53 0.817 46.9% -109 -45 +44 34.3% -1.14 3–4 (43%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.34
23 2011 1555 114.4 -1.74 -0.44 0.963 49.3% +52 — +25 44.4% -0.36 0–4 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.12 2011 1691 120.3 -1.58 -5.51 0.732 45.6% -31 -86 — 27.8% -1.61 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.41
24 2012 1565 106.3 -2.41 +0.75 0.896 47.2% — — — 40.0% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.11 2012 1689 117.4 +1.52 -2.94 0.940 48.7% +10 -50 — 45.5% -0.36 1–3 (25%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.51
25 2013 1518 113.5 -1.02 -1.71 0.784 45.6% — — — 18.2% -1.91 0–2 — — +0.03 2013 1809 149.3 +2.79 -2.73 0.988 49.7% -11 +4 -192 47.8% -0.11 7–5 (58%) 9–9 (50%) — -2.24
26 2014 1645 119.3 -0.79 -0.98 0.924 48.5% +39 — — 37.5% -0.81 0–1 4–2 (67%) — +0.19 2014 1713 128.9 -0.97 -3.58 0.796 46.4% +3 — — 33.3% -1.28 0–6 (0%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.62
27 2015 1738 126.2 -0.75 -0.78 0.871 48.2% +20 — -41 37.0% -0.52 0–4 (0%) 2–7 (22%) — -0.40 2015 1729 122.1 +0.44 +1.03 1.284 52.5% +26 — — 57.1% +0.14 1–0 1–0 — -0.11
28 2016 1700 139.2 -2.01 -2.13 0.875 47.9% +54 -162 — 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.33 2016 1661 117.0 +0.34 -3.35 0.907 48.9% +50 — — 42.1% -0.32 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.06
29 2017 1669 127.5 -0.17 +0.95 0.997 49.2% +22 — — 33.3% -0.62 0–2 1–6 (14%) — -0.39 2017 1665 110.8 -1.31 -3.25 0.724 45.2% — — — 16.7% -1.42 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.08
30 2018 1575 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1616 97.9 +1.38 +0.15 0.912 48.0% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.04
31 2019 1560 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1605 109.1 +0.20 -3.04 0.961 49.1% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — -0.28
32 2020 1554 110.8 -1.11 +2.54 0.828 47.5% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 1640 121.4 -0.40 -1.31 0.977 49.4% +18 — — 45.5% -0.32 0–4 (0%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1591 101.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1570 101.6 -0.11 -2.92 0.934 47.5% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1493 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1806 126.0 -1.72 -0.47 0.932 48.8% +36 -174 -50 40.5% -0.61 12–32 (27%) 29–33 (47%) 90.1 +0.55 — 1886 131.0 +0.91 -3.27 0.900 48.3% -25 -9 -63 40.4% -0.64 18–26 (41%) 43–43 (50%) 98.0 -2.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.