H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jack Sock vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 3-0
Jack Sock holds a 3–0 lead over Jeremy Chardy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jack Sock leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jack Sock won the 2017 Stockholm fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2017* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jack Sock | 6-4 6-4 | Jeremy Chardy | Match data |
| Jan 13, 2017* | Auckland | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Jack Sock | 5-7 6-4 6-3 | Jeremy Chardy | Match data |
| Oct 17, 2014* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jack Sock | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Jeremy Chardy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jack Sock | #808 | #8 | 3,165 | 2,127 | 177 | 147 | 54.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Jeremy Chardy | #1,077 | #25 | 1,486 | 1,968 | 290 | 303 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jack Sock | Jeremy Chardy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #878 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #381 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #150 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,893 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #75 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #26 | 1,984 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #32 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2016 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #23 | 2,034 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #45 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2017 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,992 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #103 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2018 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #106 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #32 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2019 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,634 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #34 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #253 | 1,725 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2021 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #145 | 1,775 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,896 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #131 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #69 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2023 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #671 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #78 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #40 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,918 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #75 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #107 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #519 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |