H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jack Sock vs Marius Copil H2H: 1-0

Jack Sock holds a 1–0 lead over Marius Copil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jack Sock leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jack Sock won the 2017 Washington Open second round 7-6(2) 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jack Sock
USA Age 33 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Marius Copil
ROU Age 35 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jack Sock #19 7-6(2) 7-6(6) Marius Copil #90 Match data Aug 3, 2017* R32 Washington Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jack Sock #808 #8 3,165 2,105 177 148 54.5% 0 1 0 0 3 4
Marius Copil #1,021 #56 888 1,810 47 81 36.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jack Sock Marius Copil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2010 0–1 0.0% — 1,458 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 1–2 33.3% #381 1,489 0 0 2009 1–1 50.0% #467 1,444 0 0
19 2012 5–7 41.7% #150 1,601 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #291 1,465 0 0
20 2013 10–13 43.5% #102 1,696 0 0 2011 1–2 33.3% #217 1,553 0 0
21 2014 27–20 57.4% #42 1,893 0 0 2012 3–3 50.0% #160 1,641 0 0
22 2015 33–18 64.7% #26 1,984 0 1 2013 1–5 16.7% #147 1,612 0 0
23 2016 36–19 65.5% #23 2,024 0 1 2014 6–6 50.0% #172 1,696 0 0
24 2017 38–20 65.5% #8 1,986 0 4 2015 3–5 37.5% #165 1,677 0 0
25 2018 9–21 30.0% #106 1,715 0 4 2016 3–4 42.9% #132 1,737 0 0
26 2019 0–4 0.0% #253 1,634 0 4 2017 7–14 33.3% #93 1,674 0 0
27 2020 3–4 42.9% #253 1,725 0 4 2018 15–20 42.9% #60 1,808 0 0
28 2021 6–5 54.5% #145 1,775 0 4 2019 7–19 26.9% #153 1,706 0 0
29 2022 7–10 41.2% #131 1,747 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 2023 2–4 33.3% #671 1,716 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #374 1,569 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jack Sock Marius Copil
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 2012 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2013 7 10 17 41.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 2014 18 15 33 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 2012 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2015 21 12 33 63.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2016 26 13 39 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 2014 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2017 33 15 48 68.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2018 7 14 21 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2016 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2019 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2020 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2018 12 12 24 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 2021 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2019 7 15 22 31.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2022 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2023 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 129 109 238 54.2% 31 26 57 54.4% 17 13 30 56.7% — 34 48 82 41.5% 7 24 31 22.6% 6 9 15 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 322/325 of Jack Sock's and 128/128 of Marius Copil's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jack Sock Marius Copil
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2010 1/1 4.0 7.0 55.1% 63.3% 57.5% 54.5% 66.7% 60.7% 30.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 3/3 8.7 4.0 54.7% 65.2% 50.8% 31.0% 29.1% 59.4% 35.0% 2009 2/2 7.0 4.5 48.8% 77.1% 50.6% 64.3% 41.1% 63.5% 42.4%
19 2012 12/12 9.5 5.9 55.2% 71.3% 52.4% 69.4% 30.1% 63.0% 34.3% 2010 1/1 4.0 3.0 50.0% 65.1% 39.5% 69.2% 75.0% 52.3% 37.1%
20 2013 23/23 7.0 5.2 55.0% 75.0% 51.5% 60.4% 55.3% 64.5% 34.9% 2011 3/3 7.3 1.7 57.7% 72.6% 48.2% 39.3% 17.4% 62.7% 35.0%
21 2014 47/47 6.4 3.9 58.3% 76.5% 54.5% 68.2% 49.3% 67.5% 34.6% 2012 6/6 10.8 1.8 61.8% 77.3% 52.3% 71.7% 37.0% 67.6% 35.5%
22 2015 50/51 6.1 5.2 56.9% 75.9% 53.0% 63.5% 47.5% 66.2% 35.3% 2013 6/6 9.0 3.3 56.8% 71.1% 49.4% 60.6% 21.7% 61.7% 28.3%
23 2016 54/55 6.7 3.7 58.3% 75.8% 55.2% 67.7% 37.5% 67.2% 36.5% 2014 12/12 10.5 2.0 61.0% 74.0% 52.1% 73.0% 20.2% 64.9% 31.6%
24 2017 57/58 6.8 4.0 59.7% 72.8% 52.4% 56.9% 40.8% 64.7% 36.3% 2015 8/8 12.6 3.1 55.1% 75.8% 53.4% 65.9% 41.6% 65.9% 32.6%
25 2018 30/30 6.3 4.3 61.2% 73.0% 51.0% 58.6% 36.7% 64.5% 34.7% 2016 7/7 9.6 3.4 58.2% 73.3% 55.7% 43.4% 62.7% 65.6% 36.0%
26 2019 4/4 10.8 4.5 63.0% 70.4% 49.7% 44.3% 62.5% 62.7% 28.6% 2017 21/21 10.0 3.5 56.1% 76.0% 51.6% 57.5% 35.5% 65.2% 31.5%
27 2020 7/7 5.6 4.7 60.6% 69.1% 51.8% 48.5% 45.2% 62.2% 35.7% 2018 35/35 12.8 3.3 58.9% 77.6% 55.1% 60.6% 37.3% 68.0% 32.3%
28 2021 11/11 8.5 3.8 59.3% 75.1% 47.0% 61.1% 46.0% 63.8% 36.2% 2019 26/26 11.3 3.4 57.2% 73.3% 48.8% 56.4% 35.6% 62.9% 30.3%
29 2022 17/17 6.2 3.7 64.8% 70.1% 48.6% 58.5% 40.9% 62.8% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2023 6/6 6.0 5.5 56.9% 72.8% 47.5% 70.6% 31.7% 61.8% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 1/1 11.0 2.0 62.8% 76.3% 57.1% 50.0% 0.0% 69.1% 26.3%
Career — 322/325 6.7 4.3 58.6% 74.2% 52.6% 62.1% 43.2% 65.3% 35.4% — 128/128 11.1 3.1 57.8% 75.2% 52.2% 59.8% 35.6% 65.3% 32.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jack Sock Marius Copil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1483 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1458 94.9 -2.51 -1.84 0.774 45.3% — — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — +0.07 2008 1460 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 1490 107.8 -1.04 +0.61 0.863 46.9% +9 — — 33.3% -1.00 — 0–1 — +0.29 2009 1444 105.1 -0.74 -2.41 1.162 53.2% — — — 60.0% +0.60 0–1 1–0 — +0.17
19 2012 1602 120.6 -0.99 -1.79 0.926 48.9% +18 — — 43.3% -0.67 2–3 (40%) 4–3 (57%) — +1.03 2010 1466 107.9 -1.19 -1.58 0.779 45.5% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.14
20 2013 1696 140.5 +0.25 -0.25 0.983 50.1% -7 -46 — 47.2% -0.25 1–6 (14%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.01 2011 1554 115.1 +0.38 -3.10 0.938 47.4% — — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — +0.06
21 2014 1894 151.5 +2.13 +0.15 1.067 51.5% -36 -152 -188 56.5% +0.46 4–6 (40%) 10–11 (48%) — +0.38 2012 1641 121.6 +2.57 -0.78 1.093 51.3% -2 — — 50.0% +0.07 1–1 1–1 — -0.32
22 2015 1985 166.3 +2.00 +0.71 1.042 51.0% -7 -65 -218 61.0% +0.61 11–5 (69%) 16–13 (55%) — -0.24 2013 1613 118.9 -0.92 -2.99 0.739 45.9% — — — 21.4% -1.43 1–1 0–1 — -0.16
23 2016 2024 160.1 +2.86 +1.03 1.112 51.3% +3 -111 -222 60.1% +0.45 13–6 (68%) 17–13 (57%) — +1.63 2014 1696 129.0 +0.87 -2.43 0.901 48.2% +34 -125 — 48.1% -0.26 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.33
24 2017 1987 164.2 +1.24 +1.03 1.028 50.3% +39 -114 — 58.8% +0.23 18–9 (67%) 22–9 (71%) — +1.66 2015 1678 122.4 +0.84 -1.99 0.956 49.4% +42 — -45 42.9% -0.19 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.66
25 2018 1716 137.8 +0.06 -1.43 0.976 49.6% +74 +66 — 43.4% -0.47 1–13 (7%) 8–7 (53%) — +2.03 2016 1737 124.6 +1.66 -1.66 1.047 50.6% +26 — — 50.0% -0.35 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — -0.30
26 2019 1634 108.9 -0.40 -1.52 0.767 45.8% +41 — — 9.1% -1.91 — 0–3 (0%) — +0.14 2017 1674 138.4 +1.25 -2.84 0.905 48.3% +64 -66 — 37.0% -0.76 3–4 (43%) 8–8 (50%) — +0.06
27 2020 1726 125.6 -1.79 -0.20 0.944 48.3% -53 — — 40.9% -0.73 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.22 2018 1809 146.2 +2.98 -2.62 1.009 50.1% +33 -205 -181 48.2% -0.07 3–9 (25%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.13
28 2021 1776 133.5 -0.49 -0.16 1.000 50.1% -49 — -56 53.6% +0.36 3–3 (50%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.96 2019 1706 138.7 -0.25 -4.35 0.816 47.1% +48 -145 — 35.1% -1.07 5–7 (42%) 8–5 (62%) — -1.18
29 2022 1747 131.6 -0.95 -0.13 0.959 49.5% -34 — +59 52.3% -0.23 1–6 (14%) 5–5 (50%) — -1.19 2020 1665 94.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2023 1717 116.0 +0.17 -0.95 0.884 48.4% -15 — — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.24 2021 1582 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1570 106.2 -3.65 +1.03 0.851 47.2% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.07
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1557 97.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2105 157.4 +1.18 +0.22 1.020 50.4% +5 -78 -125 53.7% +0.11 57–60 (49%) 90–78 (54%) 100.6 +1.35 — 1811 134.7 +1.23 -2.80 0.926 48.8% +41 -127 -136 41.5% -0.53 17–30 (36%) 39–34 (53%) 101.1 -2.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.