H2H data updated: 2026-08-31 00:00 UTC

Jacob Fearnley vs Jurij Rodionov

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Jacob Fearnley vs Jurij Rodionov.

Great Britain Age 25 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 0
0 main draw meetings
Austria Age 27 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jurij Rodionov #143 4-6 6-4 6-4 Jacob Fearnley #100 Match data Aug 28, 2026 Q3 Q US Open Grand Slam Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jacob Fearnley #101 #49 1,078 1,782 20 30 40.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jurij Rodionov #143 #87 666 1,645 14 26 35.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jacob Fearnley Jurij Rodionov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2018 0–1 0.0% #217 1,526 0 0
20 2019 0–2 0.0% #299 1,502 0 0
21 2020 2–2 50.0% #144 1,584 0 0
22 2024 2–3 40.0% #99 1,579 0 0 2021 3–4 42.9% #136 1,527 0 0
23 2025 15–20 42.9% #71 1,735 0 0 2022 2–4 33.3% #122 1,562 0 0
24 2026 3–7 30.0% #101 1,682 0 0 2023 5–6 45.5% #115 1,631 0 0
25 2024 1–3 25.0% #175 1,520 0 0
26 2025 0–1 0.0% #176 1,506 0 0
27 2026 1–3 25.0% #143 1,619 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jacob Fearnley Jurij Rodionov
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2018 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2019 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2020 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2024 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2021 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2025 5 11 16 31.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2026 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2023 3 2 5 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 2024 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2025 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2026 1 3 4 25.0%
Career 8 17 25 32.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 8 13 38.5% 6 13 19 31.6% 3 5 8 37.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 49/52 of Jacob Fearnley's and 40/41 of Jurij Rodionov's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jacob Fearnley Jurij Rodionov
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 —/— 2018 1/1 5.0 2.0 52.6% 58.5% 48.6% 37.5% 36.4% 53.8% 44.6%
20 —/— 2019 2/2 5.0 1.0 61.5% 70.5% 54.7% 58.3% 0.0% 64.4% 26.7%
21 —/— 2020 4/4 8.3 3.3 62.0% 66.1% 49.8% 56.6% 55.3% 60.2% 38.8%
22 2024 5/5 5.6 4.8 59.0% 72.9% 53.0% 54.0% 38.4% 64.9% 32.0% 2021 7/7 6.9 3.1 62.0% 71.1% 45.6% 58.4% 28.9% 61.6% 29.5%
23 2025 34/35 5.4 6.1 61.7% 69.2% 46.6% 53.4% 42.8% 60.5% 36.0% 2022 6/6 5.8 4.2 61.2% 74.6% 49.6% 71.7% 16.3% 65.0% 31.5%
24 2026 10/12 5.3 6.6 63.2% 68.4% 39.6% 52.5% 30.9% 57.8% 34.0% 2023 11/11 5.8 2.0 58.7% 69.1% 53.2% 53.3% 35.7% 62.8% 33.7%
25 —/— 2024 4/4 2.5 2.5 57.7% 73.0% 38.3% 30.8% 17.3% 58.4% 38.7%
26 —/— 2025 1/1 4.0 1.0 47.0% 70.0% 45.0% 63.0% 0.0% 57.0% 20.0%
27 —/— 2026 4/5 5.8 3.3 54.3% 73.5% 47.8% 77.3% 48.5% 62.0% 33.8%
Career 49/52 5.4 6.0 61.7% 69.4% 45.9% 53.2% 39.9% 60.4% 35.2% 40/41 5.8 2.8 59.1% 70.6% 48.7% 57.5% 30.3% 61.8% 33.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jacob Fearnley Jurij Rodionov
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
18 2017 1488 97.4
19 2018 1527 110.7 -1.48 -1.36 0.966 49.1% 33.3% -0.33 0–1 -0.04
20 2019 1502 103.1 -1.35 -0.72 0.749 45.5% 0.0% -2.00 0–1 -0.13
21 2020 1585 120.1 -1.08 +0.55 0.974 49.6% 46.2% -0.31 1–0 1–1 -0.02
22 2024 1580 120.7 +0.07 -0.78 0.912 48.6% +58 46.2% -0.15 2–2 (50%) -0.02 2021 1528 99.4 -1.15 -2.71 0.769 46.9% +81 40.0% -0.60 2–0 1–0 +0.28
23 2025 1735 140.6 -2.58 +0.40 0.910 48.4% -58 -19 -95 41.9% -0.39 4–3 (57%) 6–8 (43%) -1.49 2022 1563 113.7 -0.19 -0.02 0.901 48.5% -57 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) -0.10
24 2026 1682 118.8 -3.77 -0.76 0.806 46.0% -44 35.7% -0.83 1–2 (33%) 2–5 (29%) +0.02 2023 1631 113.9 -0.55 -1.62 0.906 48.1% -48 -31 42.9% -0.61 3–2 (60%) 2–5 (29%) +0.43
25 2024 1521 109.8 -1.27 +2.09 0.929 48.3% +22 25.0% -1.00 0–2 -0.26
26 2025 1506 109.4 +4.55 +1.65 0.465 40.0% 0.0% -3.50 -0.10
27 2026 1619 116.0 -2.90 +0.65 0.888 48.5% +17 30.0% -0.90 0–1 0–2 +0.23
Career 1782 133.7 -2.55 +0.04 0.887 47.9% -54 -19 -49 40.9% -0.46 5–5 (50%) 10–15 (40%) -2.98 1646 115.8 -0.90 -0.62 0.871 47.9% -51 -4 +81 36.6% -0.74 7–6 (54%) 7–12 (37%) +0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.