H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Jakob Hlasek vs Ronald Agenor H2H: 0-1

Ronald Agenor holds a 1–0 lead over Jakob Hlasek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ronald Agenor leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ronald Agenor won the 1988 Stuttgart Open round of 32 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jakob Hlasek
SUI Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Ronald Agenor
HAI Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ronald Agenor #32 6-3 6-3 Jakob Hlasek #28 Match data Jul 14, 1988* R32 Stuttgart Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jakob Hlasek #583 #7 1,308 2,062 393 302 56.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Ronald Agenor #1,507 #22 984 1,896 215 253 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jakob Hlasek Ronald Agenor
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1983 5–6 45.5% #227 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1984 16–19 45.7% #91 1,647 0 0 1984 0–2 0.0% #418 1,480 0 0
20 1985 29–23 55.8% #33 1,785 0 0 1985 17–14 54.8% #49 1,657 0 0
21 1986 35–25 58.3% #32 1,732 0 0 1986 20–22 47.6% #74 1,672 0 0
22 1987 32–21 60.4% #23 1,864 0 0 1987 25–20 55.6% #44 1,736 0 0
23 1988 46–15 75.4% #8 2,050 0 2 1988 24–18 57.1% #28 1,758 0 0
24 1989 23–18 56.1% #30 1,795 0 3 1989 24–17 58.5% #37 1,767 0 1
25 1990 41–22 65.1% #17 1,938 0 4 1990 33–25 56.9% #29 1,816 0 3
26 1991 45–25 64.3% #20 1,870 0 5 1991 16–27 37.2% #74 1,643 0 3
27 1992 26–23 53.1% #36 1,793 0 5 1992 5–16 23.8% #132 1,538 0 3
28 1993 20–25 44.4% #71 1,713 0 5 1993 17–25 40.5% #58 1,603 0 3
29 1994 22–24 47.8% #70 1,677 0 5 1994 15–23 39.5% #71 1,580 0 3
30 1995 32–27 54.2% #35 1,783 0 5 1995 8–12 40.0% #146 1,586 0 3
31 1996 20–27 42.6% #74 1,753 0 5 1996 0–5 0.0% #326 1,525 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 1998 1–1 50.0% #237 1,530 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 1999 3–7 30.0% #96 1,521 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2000 6–16 27.3% #137 1,430 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2001 1–3 25.0% #188 1,466 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jakob Hlasek Ronald Agenor
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1982 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 6 5 11 54.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1984 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1985 9 8 17 52.9% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — — — — — —
21 1986 6 9 15 40.0% 18 8 26 69.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 17 14 31 54.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1987 13 6 19 68.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 18 12 30 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1988 22 7 29 75.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 15 3 18 83.3% 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
24 1989 6 6 12 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
25 1990 17 7 24 70.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8% 1990 5 8 13 38.5% 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — 10 4 14 71.4%
26 1991 18 10 28 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 18 10 28 64.3% 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — 6 10 16 37.5%
27 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1993 8 10 18 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1993 3 10 13 23.1% 12 11 23 52.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 1994 9 9 18 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 8 13 38.5% 1994 3 7 10 30.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
30 1995 13 12 25 52.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 1995 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
31 1996 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 7 10 30.0% 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2 6 8 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 149 115 264 56.4% 75 70 145 51.7% 36 31 67 53.7% 133 86 219 60.7% — 42 76 118 35.6% 138 130 268 51.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 32 41 73 43.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 263/316 of Jakob Hlasek's and 182/207 of Ronald Agenor's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jakob Hlasek Ronald Agenor
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 1991 59/70 6.2 3.0 59.2% 76.4% 50.7% 62.0% 41.9% 65.7% 37.0% 1991 41/43 3.0 2.0 67.4% 63.9% 44.3% 45.2% 43.7% 57.1% 36.1%
27 1992 39/49 5.7 3.5 58.5% 73.5% 48.4% 61.2% 44.3% 62.8% 39.2% 1992 18/21 3.0 1.6 66.1% 60.7% 46.2% 52.1% 50.8% 55.7% 37.8%
28 1993 40/45 5.2 4.0 57.6% 74.3% 47.4% 58.3% 41.3% 62.8% 36.3% 1993 33/42 3.6 1.5 61.4% 65.9% 48.0% 55.0% 42.1% 59.0% 39.2%
29 1994 38/46 5.2 4.3 59.0% 72.7% 49.9% 54.1% 49.7% 63.2% 35.8% 1994 36/38 3.1 1.9 58.4% 66.4% 50.7% 56.8% 41.4% 59.8% 36.5%
30 1995 49/59 6.3 3.6 59.4% 73.4% 47.6% 59.9% 37.5% 63.3% 37.4% 1995 19/20 4.6 1.9 62.4% 65.9% 51.2% 58.9% 41.8% 60.2% 36.9%
31 1996 38/47 6.7 3.0 59.8% 74.5% 49.3% 53.3% 39.6% 64.1% 34.1% 1996 3/5 6.3 2.7 68.4% 63.8% 37.7% 44.5% 56.7% 55.4% 38.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 2/2 2.0 3.5 73.0% 64.0% 34.2% 42.3% 48.8% 55.9% 44.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 8/10 1.4 2.1 71.1% 62.3% 43.3% 55.5% 35.1% 57.4% 34.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 18/22 2.6 3.1 65.3% 62.1% 50.7% 49.4% 40.9% 58.3% 37.1%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 4/4 1.5 2.8 66.1% 64.1% 48.7% 55.8% 54.6% 59.0% 37.2%
Career — 263/695 5.9 3.5 58.9% 74.3% 48.9% 58.5% 42.1% 63.8% 36.7% — 182/468 3.2 2.0 63.9% 64.4% 47.6% 52.5% 43.3% 58.3% 37.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jakob Hlasek Ronald Agenor
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1982 1516 114.8 — — — — +52 — — 37.5% -1.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1567 112.2 — — — — +8 — +34 46.7% -0.03 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 104.2 +0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 1648 128.9 — — — — +9 -160 +14 43.7% -0.39 5–4 (56%) 5–6 (45%) 100.9 +1.04 1984 1481 105.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — +0.07
20 1985 1785 145.6 — — — — +2 -156 -119 54.0% +0.12 7–5 (58%) 10–7 (59%) 106.4 -1.17 1985 1658 140.8 — — — — -107 +24 — 51.4% +0.27 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.8 +0.06
21 1986 1733 142.9 — — — — -50 +67 -41 55.9% +0.32 11–10 (52%) 16–10 (62%) 103.8 +0.10 1986 1673 146.8 — — — — -122 +62 — 48.5% +0.17 4–9 (31%) 3–6 (33%) 94.6 -1.67
22 1987 1865 151.8 — — — — +13 -128 -111 58.0% +0.44 7–5 (58%) 8–6 (57%) 103.3 -2.72 1987 1737 146.2 — — — — -103 +50 — 52.5% +0.28 11–9 (55%) 6–12 (33%) 97.1 -0.17
23 1988 2050 159.4 — — — — +34 -279 — 64.7% +0.98 18–5 (78%) 15–15 (50%) 106.7 -1.83 1988 1758 147.5 — — — — -108 +114 — 54.5% +0.37 10–5 (67%) 3–6 (33%) 102.0 -2.17
24 1989 1795 146.3 — — — — +95 -38 — 55.5% +0.60 8–10 (44%) 8–14 (36%) 88.6 -0.85 1989 1767 140.6 — — — — -86 +69 — 56.6% +0.51 7–6 (54%) 5–12 (29%) 95.1 -0.70
25 1990 1938 151.4 — — — — +52 -214 -223 59.5% +0.50 12–7 (63%) 15–11 (58%) 106.9 -0.05 1990 1817 146.9 — — — — -53 +22 — 52.4% +0.25 14–7 (67%) 11–11 (50%) 104.9 -2.13
26 1991 1871 151.6 +3.96 -0.75 1.078 51.3% +40 -73 -130 59.6% +0.57 15–8 (65%) 20–19 (51%) 99.9 -0.58 1991 1644 129.0 -2.96 -1.86 0.840 46.7% +4 +89 — 41.5% -0.55 9–9 (50%) 6–10 (38%) 96.0 -0.22
27 1992 1793 147.3 +1.45 +1.86 1.055 50.6% +38 -51 -34 51.2% +0.10 9–5 (64%) 5–14 (26%) 95.1 -1.64 1992 1538 118.8 -3.87 -0.90 0.853 46.8% +65 +61 — 35.2% -0.52 2–8 (20%) 0–8 (0%) 87.5 -0.10
28 1993 1714 144.6 +1.45 -0.65 0.976 49.5% +42 -38 +41 44.5% -0.09 10–7 (59%) 10–14 (42%) 100.6 -1.57 1993 1603 135.0 -0.84 +0.11 0.956 49.1% -46 +90 — 44.2% -0.28 6–10 (38%) 11–12 (48%) 98.4 -0.63
29 1994 1677 138.4 +1.07 -1.27 0.973 49.5% +6 -6 +136 45.4% -0.19 6–2 (75%) 11–10 (52%) 106.3 -1.32 1994 1580 139.1 -0.81 -0.72 0.907 48.4% -20 +103 — 42.2% -0.44 8–9 (47%) 6–9 (40%) 100.2 -1.66
30 1995 1783 142.6 +1.21 +0.39 1.019 50.3% -17 -53 — 53.3% +0.30 11–11 (50%) 18–13 (58%) 101.8 -1.57 1995 1586 133.1 -0.47 -0.84 0.927 48.7% +44 +35 — 43.8% -0.29 2–4 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.5 +0.29
31 1996 1753 139.5 +1.73 -2.17 0.951 48.9% -38 -49 +20 47.5% -0.16 3–9 (25%) 13–12 (52%) 95.2 -1.84 1996 1525 105.4 +0.11 -1.40 0.854 46.6% +53 — — 9.1% -1.91 0–1 0–6 (0%) — +0.16
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1531 103.2 -1.61 -0.77 0.999 49.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 0–1 — +0.12
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1521 118.4 -1.43 -2.23 0.813 46.6% +36 +84 — 31.8% -0.82 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.06
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1430 102.3 -2.84 -1.35 0.891 47.4% +45 +90 +95 33.9% -1.20 1–6 (14%) 5–4 (56%) 93.9 +1.60
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1467 112.1 -2.05 +0.32 0.908 48.9% +50 — — 40.0% -0.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.18
Career — 2062 152.1 +1.95 -0.42 1.014 50.1% +20 -84 -20 54.0% +0.28 125–90 (58%) 159–152 (51%) 103.8 -1.94 — 1896 144.1 -1.82 -0.97 0.891 47.8% -37 +67 +95 47.0% -0.08 82–92 (47%) 65–114 (36%) 89.5 -1.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.