H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Jarkko Nieminen vs Victor Hanescu H2H: 3-1

Jarkko Nieminen holds a 3–1 lead over Victor Hanescu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jarkko Nieminen leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Jarkko Nieminen won the 2011 Gstaad third round 7-5 6-2.

FIN Age 44 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 1
4 main draw meetings
ROU Age 44 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 28, 2011* Gstaad ATP 250 R32 Clay Jarkko Nieminen #53 7-5 6-2 Victor Hanescu #63 Match data
Apr 9, 2010* Casablanca ATP 250 R16 Clay Victor Hanescu #43 2-6 6-3 6-2 Jarkko Nieminen #71 Match data
Apr 7, 2005* Casablanca ATP 250 R32 Clay Jarkko Nieminen #123 6-3 7-6(2) Victor Hanescu #97 Match data
Jun 1, 2003* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Jarkko Nieminen #34 6-7(1) 6-4 6-2 3-6 6-3 Victor Hanescu #122 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jarkko Nieminen #1,029 #13 1,700 1,917 357 334 51.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Victor Hanescu #1,025 #26 1,671 1,843 186 226 45.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarkko Nieminen Victor Hanescu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–1 0.0% #308 1,494 0 0
19 2001 4–1 80.0% #61 1,608 0 0
20 2002 25–26 49.0% #40 1,703 0 0 2002 3–3 50.0% #172 1,520 0 0
21 2003 37–29 56.1% #36 1,728 0 0 2003 13–12 52.0% #70 1,667 0 0
22 2004 17–16 51.5% #77 1,696 0 0 2004 17–23 42.5% #92 1,572 0 0
23 2005 29–22 56.9% #28 1,797 0 0 2005 25–22 53.2% #35 1,727 0 0
24 2006 49–27 64.5% #15 1,789 0 1 2006 0–6 0.0% #646 1,652 0 0
25 2007 31–26 54.4% #27 1,814 0 1 2007 7–7 50.0% #76 1,683 0 0
26 2008 24–26 48.0% #37 1,758 0 1 2008 20–21 48.8% #50 1,756 0 1
27 2009 11–14 44.0% #88 1,712 0 1 2009 26–30 46.4% #48 1,705 0 1
28 2010 28–27 50.9% #39 1,873 0 1 2010 23–24 48.9% #51 1,706 0 1
29 2011 20–25 44.4% #77 1,830 0 1 2011 16–24 40.0% #90 1,687 0 1
30 2012 23–26 46.9% #41 1,744 0 2 2012 6–13 31.6% #62 1,618 0 1
31 2013 27–26 50.9% #39 1,789 0 2 2013 18–25 41.9% #80 1,689 0 1
32 2014 23–25 47.9% #73 1,767 0 2 2014 11–15 42.3% #122 1,735 0 1
33 2015 9–17 34.6% #153 1,692 0 2 2015 1–1 50.0% #279 1,655 0 1