H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jason Jung vs Tommy Robredo

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Jason Jung vs Tommy Robredo.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jason Jung
Chinese Taipei Age 37 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Tommy Robredo
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jason Jung #125 6-4 6-3 Tommy Robredo #221 Match data Sep 28, 2020 Q2 Q Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jason Jung #1,071 #114 500 1,668 10 22 31.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tommy Robredo #1,059 #5 2,770 2,051 525 353 59.8% 0 1 0 1 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jason Jung Tommy Robredo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1999 2–2 50.0% #244 1,534 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2000 0–2 0.0% #131 1,496 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2001 37–20 64.9% #30 1,761 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 2002 32–25 56.1% #30 1,793 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 2003 38–26 59.4% #21 1,760 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 2004 41–25 62.1% #13 1,831 0 2
23 — — — — — — — 2005 42–24 63.6% #19 1,851 0 2
24 — — — — — — — 2006 49–26 65.3% #7 1,867 0 4
25 — — — — — — — 2007 48–25 65.8% #10 1,856 0 6
26 — — — — — — — 2008 35–23 60.3% #21 1,872 0 7
27 — — — — — — — 2009 46–24 65.7% #16 1,905 0 9
28 2017 0–2 0.0% #239 1,465 0 0 2010 20–23 46.5% #50 1,796 0 9
29 2018 2–3 40.0% #121 1,531 0 0 2011 20–14 58.8% #51 1,785 0 10
30 2019 2–6 25.0% #127 1,559 0 0 2012 5–7 41.7% #114 1,768 0 10
31 2020 3–6 33.3% #132 1,600 0 0 2013 36–20 64.3% #18 2,004 0 12
32 2021 2–3 40.0% #178 1,537 0 0 2014 43–26 62.3% #17 1,999 0 12
33 — — — — — — — 2015 23–20 53.5% #42 1,884 0 12
34 2023 1–2 33.3% #244 1,528 0 0 2016 2–6 25.0% #358 1,813 0 12
35 — — — — — — — 2017 6–11 35.3% #164 1,740 0 12
36 — — — — — — — 2018 0–2 0.0% #201 1,684 0 12
37 — — — — — — — 2019 0–1 0.0% #205 1,583 0 12
40 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #1043 1,502 0 12

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jason Jung Tommy Robredo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 10 7 17 58.8% 23 9 32 71.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 14 14 28 50.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 10 14 24 41.7% 22 8 30 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 20 12 32 62.5% 14 7 21 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 20 11 31 64.5% 18 9 27 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 22 16 38 57.9% 22 6 28 78.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 27 13 40 67.5% 18 9 27 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 12 14 26 46.2% 21 7 28 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 27 9 36 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 15 15 30 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2018 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2011 8 7 15 53.3% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2019 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2020 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 9 9 18 50.0% 25 10 35 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
32 2021 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2014 25 13 38 65.8% 15 12 27 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 11 10 21 52.4% 11 8 19 57.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
34 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1 2 3 33.3% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 6 16 22 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — 226 182 408 55.4% 256 130 386 66.3% 30 24 54 55.6% 13 17 30 43.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 32/32 of Jason Jung's and 853/878 of Tommy Robredo's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jason Jung Tommy Robredo
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 2/4 0.0 0.5 62.8% 65.2% 54.5% 55.0% 72.7% 61.7% 44.0%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 2/2 0.0 3.5 63.6% 62.8% 26.7% 65.7% 16.7% 49.7% 28.1%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 52/57 3.5 2.9 64.8% 70.5% 51.2% 58.7% 47.5% 63.6% 40.7%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 48/57 1.9 2.8 68.1% 63.7% 50.6% 54.5% 40.3% 59.2% 40.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 63/64 2.7 2.9 68.6% 66.9% 51.0% 52.8% 43.5% 61.9% 40.1%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 62/66 4.3 3.1 59.8% 71.5% 50.1% 59.9% 39.7% 63.1% 37.9%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 65/66 3.8 2.9 61.4% 71.2% 50.2% 58.0% 40.5% 63.0% 41.5%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 75/75 3.2 1.8 69.2% 68.7% 53.3% 62.1% 48.3% 63.8% 40.5%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 73/73 3.7 1.7 67.2% 68.6% 55.3% 58.6% 47.8% 64.1% 40.7%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 57/58 3.1 1.5 68.4% 69.0% 52.3% 59.2% 40.6% 63.7% 38.8%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 70/70 4.2 2.1 63.4% 71.5% 55.2% 61.6% 43.4% 65.5% 38.9%
28 2017 2/2 4.0 3.0 61.8% 57.4% 49.1% 44.4% 75.0% 54.8% 31.3% 2010 43/43 4.3 2.1 64.8% 69.7% 54.5% 49.4% 40.9% 63.9% 36.1%
29 2018 5/5 4.2 4.0 68.0% 62.8% 51.2% 65.1% 42.6% 59.2% 33.4% 2011 32/34 3.8 2.4 62.5% 70.7% 55.4% 61.5% 40.1% 64.9% 38.8%
30 2019 8/8 3.3 2.3 64.9% 66.4% 55.2% 51.9% 32.2% 62.0% 32.2% 2012 12/12 4.8 2.2 60.7% 70.5% 49.6% 62.9% 64.6% 62.1% 35.8%
31 2020 9/9 3.2 1.9 65.0% 67.4% 47.0% 44.1% 40.1% 60.3% 35.3% 2013 56/56 4.5 2.2 60.6% 71.6% 52.3% 59.5% 42.7% 64.0% 39.0%
32 2021 5/5 3.2 3.2 65.2% 70.5% 44.0% 65.8% 30.5% 61.6% 36.2% 2014 69/69 5.1 2.0 63.8% 74.1% 54.0% 58.1% 39.6% 66.8% 37.2%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 43/43 3.7 2.0 62.8% 69.8% 51.3% 57.9% 45.1% 63.1% 36.4%
34 2023 3/3 1.3 2.3 59.3% 57.1% 46.4% 45.2% 18.2% 52.7% 31.5% 2016 8/8 5.0 2.6 61.4% 65.4% 49.3% 59.3% 30.0% 58.6% 30.2%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 17/17 2.2 1.6 65.1% 63.1% 47.3% 60.3% 47.0% 57.5% 35.1%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 2/2 2.0 3.0 63.5% 76.4% 52.9% 37.5% 14.3% 67.7% 27.0%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 1/1 2.0 2.0 60.8% 61.3% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% 52.9% 28.6%
40 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 1/1 0.0 1.0 64.4% 44.8% 37.5% 0.0% 0.0% 42.2% 31.3%
Career — 32/32 3.3 2.6 64.8% 65.3% 49.3% 52.8% 37.1% 59.7% 33.7% — 853/878 3.7 2.3 64.7% 69.7% 52.4% 58.2% 43.2% 63.4% 38.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jason Jung Tommy Robredo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1534 111.3 -1.11 +0.08 1.149 52.8% — +25 — 44.4% -0.44 1–0 1–1 — -0.28
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1496 104.2 -0.33 -3.63 0.558 40.7% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.14
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1762 138.8 +1.70 +1.94 1.118 52.1% -113 +59 -142 59.9% +0.69 13–8 (62%) 16–10 (62%) — +1.44
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1794 141.9 -1.86 +2.88 0.984 49.6% -51 +86 -168 50.0% -0.11 15–7 (68%) 11–10 (52%) — +0.25
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1760 144.7 -0.06 +2.81 1.054 50.9% -81 +199 -70 53.8% +0.23 13–8 (62%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.05
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1831 146.9 +0.42 +1.52 1.025 50.4% -13 +109 -123 56.6% +0.25 17–6 (74%) 15–11 (58%) — 0.00
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1852 145.0 +0.69 +3.15 1.121 51.7% +8 +79 -187 58.9% +0.51 12–8 (60%) 9–8 (53%) — +1.57
24 2013 1475 94.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1868 151.1 +1.63 +3.35 1.119 52.0% -22 +147 -213 62.8% +0.78 12–12 (50%) 13–11 (54%) — +1.81
25 2014 1504 109.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1857 150.3 +1.34 +3.23 1.134 52.3% +18 +126 -200 61.5% +0.75 16–10 (62%) 11–12 (48%) — +3.75
26 2015 1494 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1873 148.9 +1.00 +2.34 1.071 51.1% -73 +190 — 55.9% +0.27 8–6 (57%) 15–9 (63%) — -0.66
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1905 153.5 +2.25 +1.71 1.126 52.0% -15 +119 -212 60.7% +0.69 14–3 (82%) 15–5 (75%) — +2.30
28 2017 1466 99.2 -1.95 -2.05 0.694 43.9% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.09 2010 1797 144.2 +0.33 -0.22 1.000 49.7% +33 +108 — 47.0% -0.24 5–8 (38%) 7–8 (47%) — +1.62
29 2018 1532 109.6 -1.26 -2.42 0.819 47.0% — — +87 38.5% -0.85 1–1 0–1 — +0.05 2011 1786 146.5 +1.92 +0.31 1.105 51.8% +44 +149 — 62.2% +0.76 6–2 (75%) 5–4 (56%) — +2.04
30 2019 1559 117.1 -2.28 -1.30 0.845 47.3% +24 — — 35.0% -0.60 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.22 2012 1768 135.0 +0.23 -0.69 0.947 49.1% +22 +146 — 51.6% -0.48 0–4 (0%) 1–0 — -0.13
31 2020 1600 135.9 -1.90 -0.10 0.889 47.4% +31 — — 37.5% -1.00 1–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.21 2013 2004 157.9 +1.54 +1.91 1.083 51.3% -155 +67 -307 58.8% +0.55 14–4 (78%) 14–9 (61%) — -0.69
32 2021 1538 108.2 -2.40 -0.54 0.941 48.6% — — +68 36.4% -0.73 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.76 2014 1999 163.7 +2.95 +1.79 1.118 51.6% +11 -78 -165 59.1% +0.51 10–10 (50%) 24–20 (55%) — +0.70
33 2022 1529 100.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1885 151.8 -1.22 +0.52 0.987 49.7% +56 +17 -99 52.3% -0.03 10–7 (59%) 6–7 (46%) — +1.91
34 2023 1528 110.8 -3.54 -0.93 0.665 41.8% -1 — — 28.6% -2.28 1–0 1–0 — +0.07 2016 1814 131.0 -1.43 -1.82 0.730 45.3% +32 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–1 3–3 (50%) — -0.56
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1741 121.5 -3.64 -0.64 0.826 46.6% +76 -4 — 36.6% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.84
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1685 121.0 -3.18 +3.15 0.838 46.8% — — — 16.7% -1.34 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.31
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1583 99.7 -0.51 -0.32 0.607 41.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.30
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1582 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1514 92.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1503 96.1 -0.65 -5.56 0.541 36.6% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.08
Career — 1669 117.0 -2.13 -1.03 0.837 46.8% +23 — +79 33.8% -1.06 5–4 (56%) 3–9 (25%) 99.3 +3.81 — 2051 153.4 +0.86 +1.96 1.064 51.0% -18 +95 -163 56.4% +0.35 169–107 (61%) 178–143 (55%) 107.1 +1.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.