H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Javier Sanchez vs Adrian Voinea H2H: 1-2
Adrian Voinea holds a 2–1 lead over Javier Sanchez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Adrian Voinea leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Javier Sanchez won the 1997 Umag fourth round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 58
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 1997* | Umag | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Javier Sanchez | 6-2 6-4 | Adrian Voinea | Match data |
| Sep 26, 1996* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Adrian Voinea | 6-2 7-6(1) | Javier Sanchez | Match data |
| Feb 29, 1996* | Milan | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Adrian Voinea | 6-2 5-7 6-3 | Javier Sanchez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Javier Sanchez | #957 | #23 | 1,256 | 1,847 | 321 | 328 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Adrian Voinea | #1,046 | #36 | 957 | 1,756 | 126 | 168 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Javier Sanchez | Adrian Voinea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #225 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #202 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #55 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #56 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #51 | 1,759 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #45 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #139 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #32 | 1,733 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #71 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 33–32 | 50.8% | #41 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1993 | 39–31 | 55.7% | #34 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #110 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1994 | 25–33 | 43.1% | #42 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1995 | 33–32 | 50.8% | #36 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1996 | 30–33 | 47.6% | #37 | 1,718 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #154 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1997 | 35–33 | 51.5% | #54 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1998 | 8–26 | 23.5% | #168 | 1,506 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #281 | 1,492 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #957 | 1,481 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |