H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Javier Sanchez vs Daniel Vacek H2H: 1-3
Daniel Vacek holds a 3–1 lead over Javier Sanchez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Daniel Vacek leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1998 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-3 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 58
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 1998* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Daniel Vacek | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Javier Sanchez | Match data |
| Oct 30, 1996* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Carpet | Daniel Vacek | 6-3 7-6(3) | Javier Sanchez | Match data |
| May 25, 1994* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Daniel Vacek | 7-6(3) 0-6 6-2 6-4 | Javier Sanchez | Match data |
| Apr 20, 1994* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Javier Sanchez | 7-5 6-2 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Javier Sanchez | #957 | #23 | 1,256 | 1,847 | 321 | 328 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Javier Sanchez | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #225 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1988 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #55 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #51 | 1,759 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1990 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #32 | 1,733 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 33–32 | 50.8% | #41 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 39–31 | 55.7% | #34 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 25–33 | 43.1% | #42 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 33–32 | 50.8% | #36 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1996 | 30–33 | 47.6% | #37 | 1,718 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1997 | 35–33 | 51.5% | #54 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1998 | 8–26 | 23.5% | #168 | 1,506 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #281 | 1,492 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #957 | 1,481 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |