H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Jean-Philippe Fleurian vs Ronald Agenor H2H: 1-1

Jean-Philippe Fleurian and Ronald Agenor are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ronald Agenor leads 1–0 on grass, while Jean-Philippe Fleurian leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jean-Philippe Fleurian won the 1994 Swiss Indoors round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jean-Philippe Fleurian
FRA Age 60 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Ronald Agenor
HAI Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jean-Philippe Fleurian #89 6-4 6-4 Ronald Agenor #50 Match data Sep 29, 1994* R32 Swiss Indoors ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Ronald Agenor #27 4-6 6-3 6-3 6-4 Jean-Philippe Fleurian #105 Match data Jun 28, 1989* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jean-Philippe Fleurian #1,024 #37 645 1,759 106 156 40.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ronald Agenor #1,507 #22 984 1,896 215 253 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jean-Philippe Fleurian Ronald Agenor
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1985 0–2 0.0% #151 1,473 0 0 1984 0–2 0.0% #418 1,480 0 0
20 1986 6–3 66.7% #78 1,593 0 0 1985 17–14 54.8% #49 1,657 0 0
21 1987 4–11 26.7% #129 1,526 0 0 1986 20–22 47.6% #74 1,672 0 0
22 1988 3–7 30.0% #108 1,491 0 0 1987 25–20 55.6% #44 1,736 0 0
23 1989 12–11 52.2% #78 1,638 0 0 1988 24–18 57.1% #28 1,758 0 0
24 1990 23–29 44.2% #67 1,618 0 0 1989 24–17 58.5% #37 1,767 0 1
25 1991 20–28 41.7% #73 1,584 0 0 1990 33–25 56.9% #29 1,816 0 3
26 1992 1–11 8.3% #223 1,491 0 0 1991 16–27 37.2% #74 1,643 0 3
27 1993 1–4 20.0% #106 1,458 0 0 1992 5–16 23.8% #132 1,538 0 3
28 1994 19–21 47.5% #96 1,584 0 0 1993 17–25 40.5% #58 1,603 0 3
29 1995 4–9 30.8% #158 1,547 0 0 1994 15–23 39.5% #71 1,580 0 3
30 1996 9–15 37.5% #115 1,580 0 0 1995 8–12 40.0% #146 1,586 0 3
31 1997 4–5 44.4% #247 1,575 0 0 1996 0–5 0.0% #326 1,525 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 1998 1–1 50.0% #237 1,530 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 1999 3–7 30.0% #96 1,521 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2000 6–16 27.3% #137 1,430 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2001 1–3 25.0% #188 1,466 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jean-Philippe Fleurian Ronald Agenor
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1985 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1986 4 1 5 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — — — — — —
21 1987 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 17 14 31 54.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 18 12 30 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1989 4 7 11 36.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
24 1990 17 15 32 53.1% 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1989 5 5 10 50.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
25 1991 10 17 27 37.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 1990 5 8 13 38.5% 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — 10 4 14 71.4%
26 1992 0 6 6 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — 6 10 16 37.5%
27 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1994 7 12 19 36.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1993 3 10 13 23.1% 12 11 23 52.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 1995 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1994 3 7 10 30.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
30 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1995 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
31 1997 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2 6 8 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 59 85 144 41.0% 27 44 71 38.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 14 18 32 43.8% — 42 76 118 35.6% 138 130 268 51.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 32 41 73 43.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 133/151 of Jean-Philippe Fleurian's and 182/207 of Ronald Agenor's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jean-Philippe Fleurian Ronald Agenor
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 1991 43/48 3.2 2.9 58.5% 65.9% 50.1% 57.6% 45.4% 59.1% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 8/12 3.0 4.9 57.0% 62.5% 41.3% 56.7% 50.2% 52.7% 34.0% 1991 41/43 3.0 2.0 67.4% 63.9% 44.3% 45.2% 43.7% 57.1% 36.1%
27 1993 4/5 3.3 2.5 66.1% 64.5% 44.2% 50.2% 30.4% 57.8% 35.6% 1992 18/21 3.0 1.6 66.1% 60.7% 46.2% 52.1% 50.8% 55.7% 37.8%
28 1994 38/40 3.4 2.8 57.8% 69.3% 51.5% 62.3% 46.0% 61.8% 39.9% 1993 33/42 3.6 1.5 61.4% 65.9% 48.0% 55.0% 42.1% 59.0% 39.2%
29 1995 10/13 3.4 2.6 59.2% 66.7% 51.5% 53.6% 35.5% 60.0% 33.1% 1994 36/38 3.1 1.9 58.4% 66.4% 50.7% 56.8% 41.4% 59.8% 36.5%
30 1996 22/24 3.2 2.5 59.3% 69.1% 46.9% 45.3% 35.1% 59.9% 33.5% 1995 19/20 4.6 1.9 62.4% 65.9% 51.2% 58.9% 41.8% 60.2% 36.9%
31 1997 8/9 1.5 2.6 60.4% 65.8% 54.3% 64.9% 63.4% 61.0% 36.2% 1996 3/5 6.3 2.7 68.4% 63.8% 37.7% 44.5% 56.7% 55.4% 38.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 2/2 2.0 3.5 73.0% 64.0% 34.2% 42.3% 48.8% 55.9% 44.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 8/10 1.4 2.1 71.1% 62.3% 43.3% 55.5% 35.1% 57.4% 34.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 18/22 2.6 3.1 65.3% 62.1% 50.7% 49.4% 40.9% 58.3% 37.1%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 4/4 1.5 2.8 66.1% 64.1% 48.7% 55.8% 54.6% 59.0% 37.2%
Career — 133/262 3.2 2.9 58.8% 67.2% 49.6% 56.8% 44.1% 59.7% 37.3% — 182/468 3.2 2.0 63.9% 64.4% 47.6% 52.5% 43.3% 58.3% 37.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jean-Philippe Fleurian Ronald Agenor
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1985 1473 100.6 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.16 1984 1481 105.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — +0.07
20 1986 1593 116.2 — — — — +20 -59 — 59.3% +0.22 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 105.7 +0.77 1985 1658 140.8 — — — — -107 +24 — 51.4% +0.27 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.8 +0.06
21 1987 1527 113.2 — — — — +52 -41 — 31.7% -1.27 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 100.5 +0.86 1986 1673 146.8 — — — — -122 +62 — 48.5% +0.17 4–9 (31%) 3–6 (33%) 94.6 -1.67
22 1988 1491 114.6 — — — — +58 -15 — 37.0% -0.74 1–3 (25%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +0.53 1987 1737 146.2 — — — — -103 +50 — 52.5% +0.28 11–9 (55%) 6–12 (33%) 97.1 -0.17
23 1989 1639 132.5 — — — — -41 -47 — 53.7% +0.27 3–5 (38%) 8–7 (53%) 101.8 +0.40 1988 1758 147.5 — — — — -108 +114 — 54.5% +0.37 10–5 (67%) 3–6 (33%) 102.0 -2.17
24 1990 1618 136.2 — — — — +34 -39 — 47.0% -0.13 8–13 (38%) 10–13 (43%) 95.8 -0.54 1989 1767 140.6 — — — — -86 +69 — 56.6% +0.51 7–6 (54%) 5–12 (29%) 95.1 -0.70
25 1991 1585 131.0 -1.30 -0.21 0.948 49.4% -46 +40 -3 45.5% -0.20 7–10 (41%) 5–8 (38%) 96.0 +0.26 1990 1817 146.9 — — — — -53 +22 — 52.4% +0.25 14–7 (67%) 11–11 (50%) 104.9 -2.13
26 1992 1492 107.3 -3.38 -1.76 0.719 43.9% -10 +59 — 21.9% -1.53 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 92.9 -0.48 1991 1644 129.0 -2.96 -1.86 0.840 46.7% +4 +89 — 41.5% -0.55 9–9 (50%) 6–10 (38%) 96.0 -0.22
27 1993 1458 103.6 -1.27 -2.28 0.843 46.2% — +74 — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.38 1992 1538 118.8 -3.87 -0.90 0.853 46.8% +65 +61 — 35.2% -0.52 2–8 (20%) 0–8 (0%) 87.5 -0.10
28 1994 1584 134.3 +0.12 +0.95 1.044 51.2% -69 +41 +35 48.9% +0.19 3–4 (43%) 3–13 (19%) 94.7 +1.05 1993 1603 135.0 -0.84 +0.11 0.956 49.1% -46 +90 — 44.2% -0.28 6–10 (38%) 11–12 (48%) 98.4 -0.63
29 1995 1548 113.0 -1.51 -3.23 0.827 47.0% -13 — — 29.4% -1.06 2–1 (67%) 1–6 (14%) 99.1 +0.15 1994 1580 139.1 -0.81 -0.72 0.907 48.4% -20 +103 — 42.2% -0.44 8–9 (47%) 6–9 (40%) 100.2 -1.66
30 1996 1580 131.7 -0.94 -1.50 0.836 46.7% +26 — — 33.9% -1.20 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 98.2 -0.99 1995 1586 133.1 -0.47 -0.84 0.927 48.7% +44 +35 — 43.8% -0.29 2–4 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.5 +0.29
31 1997 1576 108.6 -1.70 -1.08 0.928 48.6% -5 — +76 47.6% 0.00 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.85 1996 1525 105.4 +0.11 -1.40 0.854 46.6% +53 — — 9.1% -1.91 0–1 0–6 (0%) — +0.16
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1531 103.2 -1.61 -0.77 0.999 49.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 0–1 — +0.12
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1521 118.4 -1.43 -2.23 0.813 46.6% +36 +84 — 31.8% -0.82 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.06
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1430 102.3 -2.84 -1.35 0.891 47.4% +45 +90 +95 33.9% -1.20 1–6 (14%) 5–4 (56%) 93.9 +1.60
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1467 112.1 -2.05 +0.32 0.908 48.9% +50 — — 40.0% -0.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.18
Career — 1759 133.6 -1.00 -0.53 0.926 48.8% -7 +5 +36 43.1% -0.38 31–51 (38%) 41–62 (40%) 92.0 +1.30 — 1896 144.1 -1.82 -0.97 0.891 47.8% -37 +67 +95 47.0% -0.08 82–92 (47%) 65–114 (36%) 89.5 -1.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.