Jeremy Chardy
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novak Djokovic | 0 | 14 | 14 | Feb 10, 2021 | H2H |
| Andy Murray | 1 | 9 | 10 | Jan 4, 2017 | H2H |
| Kei Nishikori | 2 | 7 | 9 | Jan 5, 2019 | H2H |
| David Ferrer | 2 | 7 | 9 | Sep 6, 2015 | H2H |
| Stan Wawrinka | 1 | 7 | 8 | Feb 6, 2021 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Jeremy Chardy vs Adrian Menendez Maceiras H2H: 2-1
Jeremy Chardy holds a 2–1 lead over Adrian Menendez Maceiras in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jeremy Chardy leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jeremy Chardy won the 2019 Montpellier Open first round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
2
–
1
3 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremy Chardy | 6-1 6-1 | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | Match data | Feb 7, 2019* | R32 | Montpellier Open | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Adrian Menendez Maceiras | 7-5 7-6(5) | Jeremy Chardy | Match data | Feb 16, 2018* | R16 | Dallas Open | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Jeremy Chardy | 7-6(5) 6-7(3) 6-2 6-1 | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | Match data | Jan 16, 2013* | R128 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremy Chardy | #1,077 | #25 | 1,486 | 1,967 | 293 | 304 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Adrian Menendez Maceiras | — | — | — | 1,644 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jeremy Chardy | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #75 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #32 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #45 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #103 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #32 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #34 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,897 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #69 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #78 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #40 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,917 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #75 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #107 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #519 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Jeremy Chardy | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | ||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 2006 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 2007 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2015 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 2009 | 17 | 17 | 34 | 50.0% | 15 | 8 | 23 | 65.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2017 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 2010 | 14 | 15 | 29 | 48.3% | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2018 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2019 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 18 | 15 | 33 | 54.5% | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 20 | 17 | 37 | 54.1% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 13 | 15 | 28 | 46.4% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 16 | 14 | 30 | 53.3% | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 164 | 171 | 335 | 49.0% | 100 | 99 | 199 | 50.3% | 29 | 34 | 63 | 46.0% | Career | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
Performance Progression by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 591/597 of Jeremy Chardy's and 24/24 of Adrian Menendez Maceiras's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Jeremy Chardy | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 2006 | 4/4 | 3.8 | 5.5 | 60.9% | 63.7% | 43.3% | 46.2% | 47.8% | 55.6% | 42.3% | 2012 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 57.6% | 61.4% | 45.2% | 50.0% | 20.0% | 54.5% | 27.3% |
| 2007 | 3/3 | 7.7 | 3.0 | 57.6% | 70.9% | 47.9% | 53.3% | 32.6% | 61.0% | 31.3% | 2013 | 2/2 | 6.0 | 2.5 | 62.0% | 54.0% | 41.9% | 54.2% | 25.0% | 49.3% | 25.7% |
| 2008 | 19/19 | 10.2 | 5.2 | 62.0% | 75.6% | 51.4% | 58.1% | 39.3% | 66.2% | 32.6% | 2015 | 5/5 | 6.0 | 3.2 | 58.6% | 68.8% | 51.3% | 57.4% | 54.9% | 61.5% | 30.9% |
| 2009 | 62/62 | 8.6 | 3.3 | 58.9% | 75.0% | 53.0% | 60.5% | 39.4% | 65.8% | 34.5% | 2017 | 6/6 | 5.0 | 1.7 | 61.5% | 69.1% | 47.8% | 48.6% | 38.5% | 61.8% | 33.5% |
| 2010 | 52/52 | 8.3 | 3.5 | 57.7% | 73.6% | 49.1% | 58.1% | 38.6% | 63.2% | 35.9% | 2018 | 6/6 | 3.7 | 2.0 | 63.8% | 65.7% | 46.2% | 56.4% | 40.0% | 58.1% | 33.1% |
| 2011 | 26/26 | 6.7 | 4.3 | 57.2% | 72.5% | 44.6% | 58.5% | 37.2% | 60.6% | 33.1% | 2019 | 4/4 | 4.0 | 2.8 | 58.7% | 62.7% | 45.2% | 43.3% | 45.9% | 55.4% | 32.5% |
| 2012 | 44/44 | 7.4 | 4.1 | 56.7% | 74.1% | 50.2% | 68.3% | 39.9% | 63.8% | 37.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 47/47 | 8.3 | 5.2 | 60.9% | 73.7% | 49.2% | 61.8% | 37.3% | 64.2% | 34.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 60/60 | 8.5 | 4.0 | 58.9% | 76.2% | 51.5% | 61.6% | 40.3% | 66.0% | 35.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 54/54 | 7.5 | 4.3 | 62.0% | 75.1% | 52.9% | 60.3% | 39.9% | 66.6% | 35.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 38/38 | 8.1 | 5.1 | 59.0% | 74.8% | 49.8% | 54.7% | 45.4% | 64.6% | 37.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 37/38 | 7.8 | 4.3 | 63.2% | 73.3% | 48.9% | 60.4% | 37.1% | 64.5% | 36.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 45/45 | 8.5 | 4.2 | 63.1% | 75.8% | 49.3% | 59.0% | 36.1% | 66.0% | 34.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 55/55 | 9.2 | 4.0 | 62.6% | 73.6% | 48.6% | 63.4% | 39.5% | 64.3% | 34.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 7/7 | 8.0 | 5.7 | 60.7% | 70.7% | 43.6% | 54.5% | 24.6% | 60.0% | 34.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 33/38 | 6.1 | 4.1 | 62.1% | 69.6% | 48.7% | 53.1% | 47.3% | 61.6% | 33.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 5/5 | 3.0 | 8.2 | 63.6% | 60.5% | 38.6% | 49.4% | 54.0% | 52.0% | 30.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Jeremy Chardy | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 2005 | 1511 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1472 | 97.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 1547 | 109.6 | -0.01 | -0.38 | 0.953 | 48.3% | — | +18 | — | 54.5% | +0.18 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.22 | 2008 | 1448 | 96.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 1563 | 110.4 | -0.05 | -2.80 | 0.804 | 46.1% | — | — | — | 14.3% | -1.71 | 0–1 | 1–3 (25%) | — | +0.03 | 2009 | 1427 | 100.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 1682 | 127.9 | +1.67 | -2.03 | 0.965 | 49.3% | -129 | +32 | — | 45.6% | +0.05 | 7–1 (88%) | 5–12 (29%) | 104.0 | -0.36 | 2010 | 1407 | 101.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 1784 | 150.0 | +2.44 | -0.94 | 1.011 | 50.2% | -58 | +89 | -176 | 51.0% | +0.02 | 11–6 (65%) | 17–14 (55%) | 108.8 | -2.59 | 2011 | 1425 | 100.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 1829 | 151.4 | +0.53 | +0.22 | 0.977 | 49.5% | -15 | -14 | -202 | 46.7% | -0.29 | 6–6 (50%) | 14–9 (61%) | 105.6 | -2.43 | 2012 | 1499 | 98.1 | -0.33 | -2.29 | 0.600 | 41.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.01 |
| 2011 | 1730 | 130.1 | -0.73 | -3.31 | 0.842 | 47.4% | +14 | +22 | — | 34.4% | -1.00 | 1–5 (17%) | 5–6 (45%) | 93.3 | -0.53 | 2013 | 1574 | 109.6 | -2.38 | -2.31 | 0.508 | 38.5% | — | — | — | 16.7% | -3.17 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.10 |
| 2012 | 1824 | 146.0 | +0.74 | -0.29 | 1.023 | 50.5% | -35 | -27 | -210 | 52.8% | +0.08 | 5–5 (50%) | 10–9 (53%) | 101.5 | +1.81 | 2014 | 1563 | 107.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 1798 | 148.4 | +0.56 | -0.91 | 0.973 | 49.5% | -1 | -38 | -80 | 48.4% | -0.05 | 6–8 (43%) | 12–9 (57%) | 99.8 | +2.11 | 2015 | 1610 | 113.9 | -2.56 | -4.46 | 0.803 | 46.7% | -2 | — | — | 35.7% | -1.07 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.22 |
| 2014 | 1860 | 155.3 | +2.21 | +0.27 | 1.044 | 50.4% | -17 | -23 | -33 | 52.6% | +0.05 | 10–8 (56%) | 20–20 (50%) | 102.1 | +0.64 | 2016 | 1588 | 109.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 1897 | 159.6 | +2.09 | +0.92 | 1.065 | 50.9% | -10 | -37 | — | 50.4% | +0.06 | 7–10 (41%) | 13–16 (45%) | 97.1 | -0.92 | 2017 | 1607 | 112.5 | -1.85 | -1.76 | 0.877 | 47.9% | +51 | — | — | 43.8% | -0.69 | 0–2 | 3–2 (60%) | — | +0.66 |
| 2016 | 1753 | 145.0 | +0.78 | +1.08 | 1.065 | 50.9% | -18 | +104 | +1 | 47.4% | +0.14 | 4–6 (40%) | 5–12 (29%) | 91.1 | +2.28 | 2018 | 1604 | 116.5 | -2.99 | -1.63 | 0.789 | 46.5% | +59 | — | — | 40.0% | -1.33 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 100.4 | +0.09 |
| 2017 | 1781 | 145.1 | +0.66 | +0.08 | 1.015 | 50.0% | +8 | +40 | -55 | 42.2% | -0.40 | 6–6 (50%) | 7–7 (50%) | 100.7 | -1.26 | 2019 | 1598 | 111.3 | -3.29 | -1.62 | 0.729 | 44.2% | — | — | — | 30.0% | -1.10 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.06 |
| 2018 | 1830 | 155.4 | +2.05 | -0.91 | 1.008 | 50.0% | -17 | +15 | -13 | 49.6% | +0.03 | 9–4 (69%) | 12–9 (57%) | 106.3 | -1.20 | 2020 | 1584 | 101.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 1918 | 154.7 | +0.56 | -0.62 | 0.971 | 49.5% | -20 | -38 | -152 | 49.0% | +0.12 | 15–9 (63%) | 14–26 (35%) | 98.6 | -2.48 | 2021 | 1558 | 98.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 1786 | 126.6 | -0.59 | -0.34 | 0.856 | 47.3% | +42 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.05 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | -1.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1795 | 146.5 | -0.75 | -1.52 | 0.882 | 48.1% | +76 | -33 | -95 | 46.9% | -0.40 | 12–6 (67%) | 15–8 (65%) | 106.9 | -2.92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 1733 | 104.8 | -3.39 | -1.83 | 0.643 | 42.4% | — | — | — | 21.4% | -2.21 | — | — | — | -0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1967 | 154.7 | +1.06 | -0.45 | 0.988 | 49.7% | -13 | +5 | -91 | 47.8% | -0.12 | 100–82 (55%) | 150–162 (48%) | 102.9 | -1.59 | Career | 1645 | 111.3 | -2.50 | -2.33 | 0.764 | 45.6% | +38 | — | — | 34.4% | -1.33 | 3–8 (27%) | 9–7 (56%) | 98.7 | +3.83 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Adrian Menendez Maceiras
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremy Chardy | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 7, 2019 | — |
| Taro Daniel | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 12, 2019 | — |
| Fernando Verdasco | 1 | 0 | 1 | Apr 11, 2019 | — |
| Christopher Eubanks | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 14, 2019 | — |
| Denis Shapovalov | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 20, 2018 | — |