H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jeremy Chardy vs Florent Serra H2H: 0-1
Florent Serra holds a 1–0 lead over Jeremy Chardy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Florent Serra leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Florent Serra won the 2009 New Haven third round 6-7(8) 7-6(4) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2009* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Florent Serra | 6-7(8) 7-6(4) 6-1 | Jeremy Chardy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremy Chardy | #1,077 | #25 | 1,486 | 1,968 | 290 | 303 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Florent Serra | #942 | #36 | 1,371 | 1,816 | 123 | 170 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jeremy Chardy | Florent Serra | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #75 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #32 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #45 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #213 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #103 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2012 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #32 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #60 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2013 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #34 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2014 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2015 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,896 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 24–29 | 45.3% | #65 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2016 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #69 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #69 | 1,695 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2017 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #78 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #171 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #40 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2019 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,918 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #75 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #107 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #519 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |