H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Jeremy Chardy vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 1-2

Lukas Lacko holds a 2–1 lead over Jeremy Chardy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Lukas Lacko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jeremy Chardy won the 2010 Wimbledon second round 6-3 7-6(4) 4-6 6-7(5) 8-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jeremy Chardy
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Lukas Lacko
SVK Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeremy Chardy #55 6-3 7-6(4) 4-6 6-7(5) 8-6 Lukas Lacko #75 Match data Jun 24, 2010* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Lukas Lacko #75 7-5 7-6(0) Jeremy Chardy #55 Match data Jun 10, 2010* R32 Halle Open ATP 250 Grass
Lukas Lacko #66 7-6(4) 2-1 (ret.) Jeremy Chardy #41 Match data Feb 19, 2010* R16 Memphis ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,967 293 304 49.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lukas Lacko #1,505 #44 917 1,838 81 135 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jeremy Chardy Lukas Lacko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,546 0 0 2007 0–2 0.0% #139 1,499 0 0
20 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #325 1,480 0 0
21 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,682 0 0 2009 1–3 25.0% #82 1,607 0 0
22 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,783 0 1 2010 16–21 43.2% #89 1,669 0 0
23 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,829 0 1 2011 4–7 36.4% #112 1,670 0 0
24 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,729 0 1 2012 12–19 38.7% #51 1,644 0 0
25 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,823 0 1 2013 11–16 40.7% #81 1,667 0 0
26 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,798 0 1 2014 11–17 39.3% #94 1,733 0 0
27 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1 2015 2–12 14.3% #110 1,647 0 0
28 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,897 0 1 2016 4–7 36.4% #122 1,682 0 0
29 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1 2017 7–10 41.2% #92 1,740 0 0
30 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,781 0 1 2018 11–16 40.7% #114 1,677 0 0
31 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1 2019 1–3 25.0% #183 1,579 0 0
32 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,917 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1 2021 1–1 50.0% #190 1,497 0 0
34 2021 20–18 52.6% #107 1,794 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,733 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jeremy Chardy Lukas Lacko
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2006 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2009 17 17 34 50.0% 15 8 23 65.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2010 14 15 29 48.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2011 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2011 4 10 14 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2012 10 10 20 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2013 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 8 9 17 47.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2014 18 15 33 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2015 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2015 20 17 37 54.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2016 9 12 21 42.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2017 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2017 11 12 23 47.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 2018 6 13 19 31.6% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5%
31 2018 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2019 16 14 30 53.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2021 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
34 2021 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 164 171 335 49.0% 100 99 199 50.3% 29 34 63 46.0% — 60 95 155 38.7% 2 14 16 12.5% 19 26 45 42.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 591/597 of Jeremy Chardy's and 215/216 of Lukas Lacko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jeremy Chardy Lukas Lacko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2006 4/4 3.8 5.5 60.9% 63.7% 43.3% 46.2% 47.8% 55.6% 42.3% 2007 2/2 3.0 3.0 58.5% 59.7% 48.3% 32.1% 8.3% 55.0% 22.6%
20 2007 3/3 7.7 3.0 57.6% 70.9% 47.9% 53.3% 32.6% 61.0% 31.3% 2008 1/1 8.0 7.0 54.5% 70.9% 47.0% 64.7% 28.6% 60.0% 31.1%
21 2008 19/19 10.2 5.2 62.0% 75.6% 51.4% 58.1% 39.3% 66.2% 32.6% 2009 4/4 5.5 2.0 64.4% 71.7% 48.3% 67.5% 21.5% 63.4% 24.6%
22 2009 62/62 8.6 3.3 58.9% 75.0% 53.0% 60.5% 39.4% 65.8% 34.5% 2010 37/37 6.7 2.6 58.6% 72.6% 50.4% 55.4% 41.7% 63.4% 36.0%
23 2010 52/52 8.3 3.5 57.7% 73.6% 49.1% 58.1% 38.6% 63.2% 35.9% 2011 11/11 6.2 3.4 57.9% 66.4% 48.8% 61.5% 49.0% 59.2% 32.9%
24 2011 26/26 6.7 4.3 57.2% 72.5% 44.6% 58.5% 37.2% 60.6% 33.1% 2012 30/31 6.3 2.0 60.2% 68.3% 49.2% 50.9% 38.9% 60.9% 34.2%
25 2012 44/44 7.4 4.1 56.7% 74.1% 50.2% 68.3% 39.9% 63.8% 37.0% 2013 27/27 5.7 2.8 57.8% 68.4% 48.1% 53.4% 37.5% 59.7% 35.6%
26 2013 47/47 8.3 5.2 60.9% 73.7% 49.2% 61.8% 37.3% 64.2% 34.8% 2014 28/28 4.9 2.6 57.9% 72.2% 50.4% 46.3% 46.3% 63.1% 33.4%
27 2014 60/60 8.5 4.0 58.9% 76.2% 51.5% 61.6% 40.3% 66.0% 35.5% 2015 14/14 7.6 2.4 60.6% 66.1% 48.3% 52.4% 18.2% 59.5% 28.3%
28 2015 54/54 7.5 4.3 62.0% 75.1% 52.9% 60.3% 39.9% 66.6% 35.6% 2016 11/11 5.7 3.3 56.9% 69.7% 49.9% 52.4% 53.8% 60.8% 31.2%
29 2016 38/38 8.1 5.1 59.0% 74.8% 49.8% 54.7% 45.4% 64.6% 37.8% 2017 17/17 7.2 2.2 57.4% 74.0% 56.2% 58.3% 35.3% 65.9% 33.4%
30 2017 37/38 7.8 4.3 63.2% 73.3% 48.9% 60.4% 37.1% 64.5% 36.1% 2018 27/27 8.0 3.1 57.1% 74.5% 51.2% 48.5% 37.5% 64.4% 34.5%
31 2018 45/45 8.5 4.2 63.1% 75.8% 49.3% 59.0% 36.1% 66.0% 34.3% 2019 4/4 5.3 2.3 61.2% 71.4% 49.5% 68.5% 8.3% 62.5% 28.2%
32 2019 55/55 9.2 4.0 62.6% 73.6% 48.6% 63.4% 39.5% 64.3% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 7/7 8.0 5.7 60.7% 70.7% 43.6% 54.5% 24.6% 60.0% 34.3% 2021 2/2 4.0 1.5 62.4% 71.8% 63.0% 62.5% 16.7% 68.7% 32.3%
34 2021 33/38 6.1 4.1 62.1% 69.6% 48.7% 53.1% 47.3% 61.6% 33.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 5/5 3.0 8.2 63.6% 60.5% 38.6% 49.4% 54.0% 52.0% 30.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 591/597 8.0 4.2 60.3% 74.0% 49.8% 60.0% 39.6% 64.4% 35.2% — 215/216 6.4 2.6 58.5% 70.7% 50.3% 53.0% 38.2% 62.2% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jeremy Chardy Lukas Lacko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2005 1511 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1483 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 1547 109.6 -0.01 -0.38 0.953 48.3% — +18 — 54.5% +0.18 — 0–1 — -0.22 2007 1499 101.9 +1.81 -2.71 0.502 39.5% — — — 16.7% -2.67 — — — +0.02
20 2007 1563 110.4 -0.05 -2.80 0.804 46.1% — — — 14.3% -1.71 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.03 2008 1480 94.2 -0.69 -1.07 0.779 46.8% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.29
21 2008 1682 127.9 +1.67 -2.03 0.965 49.3% -129 +32 — 45.6% +0.05 7–1 (88%) 5–12 (29%) 104.0 -0.36 2009 1607 112.9 -1.36 -0.52 0.671 46.0% — — +49 30.0% -0.80 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.10
22 2009 1784 150.0 +2.44 -0.94 1.011 50.2% -58 +89 -176 51.0% +0.02 11–6 (65%) 17–14 (55%) 108.8 -2.59 2010 1670 135.5 +0.10 -0.24 0.982 49.4% -21 -170 -17 45.5% -0.57 6–12 (33%) 15–6 (71%) 101.4 -0.83
23 2010 1829 151.4 +0.53 +0.22 0.977 49.5% -15 -14 -202 46.7% -0.29 6–6 (50%) 14–9 (61%) 105.6 -2.43 2011 1670 132.6 -1.32 -1.02 0.806 46.9% +1 — — 37.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 101.1 -0.54
24 2011 1730 130.1 -0.73 -3.31 0.842 47.4% +14 +22 — 34.4% -1.00 1–5 (17%) 5–6 (45%) 93.3 -0.53 2012 1644 139.6 -1.32 -1.68 0.874 47.5% +20 -213 +119 38.6% -0.76 6–3 (67%) 5–8 (38%) 100.0 -0.47
25 2012 1824 146.0 +0.74 -0.29 1.023 50.5% -35 -27 -210 52.8% +0.08 5–5 (50%) 10–9 (53%) 101.5 +1.81 2013 1668 139.8 -2.67 -1.18 0.882 47.9% +30 — — 45.6% -0.69 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 103.0 -0.64
26 2013 1798 148.4 +0.56 -0.91 0.973 49.5% -1 -38 -80 48.4% -0.05 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 99.8 +2.11 2014 1734 137.9 -0.40 -1.90 0.904 48.4% +3 — -21 39.4% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 98.2 -0.19
27 2014 1860 155.3 +2.21 +0.27 1.044 50.4% -17 -23 -33 52.6% +0.05 10–8 (56%) 20–20 (50%) 102.1 +0.64 2015 1648 120.8 -3.25 -3.69 0.699 44.0% -38 — +63 26.2% -1.62 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.4 -0.16
28 2015 1897 159.6 +2.09 +0.92 1.065 50.9% -10 -37 — 50.4% +0.06 7–10 (41%) 13–16 (45%) 97.1 -0.92 2016 1682 124.0 -2.47 -1.63 0.798 46.8% -124 — +133 38.5% -0.69 1–0 2–3 (40%) — +0.21
29 2016 1753 145.0 +0.78 +1.08 1.065 50.9% -18 +104 +1 47.4% +0.14 4–6 (40%) 5–12 (29%) 91.1 +2.28 2017 1740 131.9 +1.11 -2.04 0.978 49.7% -14 — +51 40.5% -0.36 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.17
30 2017 1781 145.1 +0.66 +0.08 1.015 50.0% +8 +40 -55 42.2% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 7–7 (50%) 100.7 -1.26 2018 1678 127.0 -0.16 -1.20 0.969 49.4% -91 — +171 43.3% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +1.00
31 2018 1830 155.4 +2.05 -0.91 1.008 50.0% -17 +15 -13 49.6% +0.03 9–4 (69%) 12–9 (57%) 106.3 -1.20 2019 1579 109.6 -3.16 -1.14 0.753 46.3% -3 — — 25.0% -1.63 — — — +0.11
32 2019 1918 154.7 +0.56 -0.62 0.971 49.5% -20 -38 -152 49.0% +0.12 15–9 (63%) 14–26 (35%) 98.6 -2.48 2020 1514 93.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 1786 126.6 -0.59 -0.34 0.856 47.3% +42 — — 30.0% -1.05 1–1 0–1 — -1.08 2021 1497 101.4 +0.23 -1.99 1.032 50.8% — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 — +0.09
34 2021 1795 146.5 -0.75 -1.52 0.882 48.1% +76 -33 -95 46.9% -0.40 12–6 (67%) 15–8 (65%) 106.9 -2.92 2022 1445 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1733 104.8 -3.39 -1.83 0.643 42.4% — — — 21.4% -2.21 — — — -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1967 154.7 +1.06 -0.45 0.988 49.7% -13 +5 -91 47.8% -0.12 100–82 (55%) 150–162 (48%) 102.9 -1.59 — 1838 133.0 -0.96 -1.44 0.886 48.0% -14 -189 +77 39.8% -0.70 28–36 (44%) 46–49 (48%) 97.9 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.