H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Jeremy Chardy vs Marcos Daniel H2H: 1-0
Jeremy Chardy holds a 1–0 lead over Marcos Daniel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jeremy Chardy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jeremy Chardy won the 2009 Australian Open first round 6-4 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2009* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jeremy Chardy | 6-4 6-4 6-1 | Marcos Daniel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremy Chardy | #1,077 | #25 | 1,486 | 1,968 | 290 | 303 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Marcos Daniel | #904 | #56 | 942 | 1,649 | 20 | 63 | 24.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jeremy Chardy | Marcos Daniel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #75 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #32 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #45 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #103 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #32 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2013 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #34 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #94 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #165 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,896 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2016 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #69 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #87 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2017 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #78 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #87 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #40 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2019 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,918 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #904 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #75 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #107 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #519 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |