H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jiri Vanek vs Tomas Behrend H2H: 1-2
Tomas Behrend holds a 2–1 lead over Jiri Vanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Tomas Behrend leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Behrend won the 2006 Acapulco third round 7-6(4) 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2006* | Acapulco | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tomas Behrend | 7-6(4) 5-7 6-3 | Jiri Vanek | Match data |
| Feb 28, 2003* | Copenhagen | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Tomas Behrend | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-3 | Jiri Vanek | Match data |
| Jul 28, 2000* | San Marino | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Jiri Vanek | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Tomas Behrend | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Vanek | #1,543 | #74 | 796 | 1,644 | 67 | 120 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tomas Behrend | #1,008 | #74 | 515 | 1,676 | 41 | 72 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jiri Vanek | Tomas Behrend | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #495 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #281 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #119 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #143 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #142 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #115 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #129 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #99 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #155 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #102 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #87 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #101 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2008 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #124 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #89 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |