H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Joao Sousa vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 1-0
Joao Sousa holds a 1–0 lead over Michal Przysiezny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Joao Sousa leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Joao Sousa won the 2015 Kuala Lumpur third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POR
Age 37
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2015* | Kuala Lumpur | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Joao Sousa | 6-2 6-2 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joao Sousa | #954 | #28 | 1,355 | 1,917 | 189 | 247 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Joao Sousa | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #592 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #49 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 23–33 | 41.1% | #54 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #33 | 1,904 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #57 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #44 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #60 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #140 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #249 | 1,509 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #726 | 1,503 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |