H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Joao Sousa vs Rogerio Dutra Silva H2H: 0-1
Rogerio Dutra Silva holds a 1–0 lead over Joao Sousa in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rogerio Dutra Silva leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rogerio Dutra Silva won the 2017 Geneva third round 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POR
Age 37
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2017* | Geneva | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Rogerio Dutra Silva | 6-4 7-6(5) | Joao Sousa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joao Sousa | #954 | #28 | 1,355 | 1,917 | 189 | 247 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Rogerio Dutra Silva | #735 | #63 | 733 | 1,745 | 23 | 59 | 28.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Joao Sousa | Rogerio Dutra Silva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #592 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #49 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2014 | 23–33 | 41.1% | #54 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2015 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #33 | 1,904 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #57 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2018 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #44 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #132 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #60 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #283 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2020 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #125 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2021 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #140 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #98 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2022 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #101 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2023 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #249 | 1,509 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #159 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #726 | 1,503 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |