H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
John Millman vs Henri Laaksonen H2H: 0-1
Henri Laaksonen holds a 1–0 lead over John Millman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Henri Laaksonen leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Henri Laaksonen won the 2021 US Open first round 7-6(6) 7-6(2) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2022 | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | Q1 | Grass | John Millman | 6-2 6-4 | Henri Laaksonen | Match data |
| Sep 1, 2021* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Henri Laaksonen | 7-6(6) 7-6(2) 6-1 | John Millman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Millman | #1,164 | #33 | 1,530 | 1,899 | 113 | 143 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Henri Laaksonen | #1,622 | #84 | 798 | 1,830 | 37 | 64 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | John Millman | Henri Laaksonen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #244 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #541 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #318 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #92 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #84 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #104 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #128 | 1,819 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2018 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #98 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2019 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #48 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #172 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2020 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,820 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2021 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #72 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2022 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #147 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2023 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #483 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |