H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Jordan Thompson vs Max Purcell H2H: 1-2
Max Purcell holds a 2–1 lead over Jordan Thompson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Max Purcell leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jordan Thompson won the 2023 Chengdu third round 6-2 7-6(8).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 32
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 28
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2023* | Chengdu | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jordan Thompson | 6-2 7-6(8) | Max Purcell | Match data |
| May 30, 2023* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Max Purcell | 7-5 1-6 6-4 6-4 | Jordan Thompson | Match data |
| Aug 25, 2021* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Max Purcell | 7-5 6-4 | Jordan Thompson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Thompson | #309 | #26 | 1,745 | 1,944 | 150 | 172 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Max Purcell | #650 | #40 | 1,051 | 1,754 | 31 | 49 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jordan Thompson | Max Purcell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2016 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #79 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #94 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #176 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #72 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #63 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #45 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #51 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #105 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2022 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #84 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #55 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #108 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2026 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |