H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Jozef Kovalik vs Albert Montanes H2H: 0-1
Albert Montanes holds a 1–0 lead over Jozef Kovalik in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Albert Montanes leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Montanes won the 2016 Quito third round 6-3 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Slovakia
Age 33
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 45
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2016* | Quito | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Albert Montanes | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | Jozef Kovalik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jozef Kovalik | #591 | #80 | 701 | 1,758 | 26 | 46 | 36.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Albert Montanes | #335 | #22 | 1,770 | 1,920 | 257 | 287 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jozef Kovalik | Albert Montanes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #65 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #78 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #99 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #165 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #71 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #85 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #85 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #139 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #131 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #45 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2021 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #149 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #31 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #137 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #25 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2023 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #228 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #53 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2024 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #96 | 1,634 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #108 | 1,693 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #116 | 1,697 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #164 | 1,637 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #335 | 1,612 | 0 | 6 |