H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Jozef Kovalik vs Dominic Thiem H2H: 0-2

Dominic Thiem holds a 2–0 lead over Jozef Kovalik in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dominic Thiem leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominic Thiem won the 2018 Barcelona Open third round 7-6(5) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jozef Kovalik
Slovakia Age 33 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Dominic Thiem
AUT Age 33 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dominic Thiem #7 7-6(5) 6-2 Jozef Kovalik #146 Match data Apr 27, 2018* R16 Barcelona Open ATP 500 Clay
Dominic Thiem #13 7-6(4) 7-6(3) Jozef Kovalik #182 Match data Mar 13, 2016* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jozef Kovalik #591 #80 701 1,759 26 46 36.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dominic Thiem #1,174 #3 9,125 2,240 337 207 61.9% 1 1 0 5 10 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jozef Kovalik Dominic Thiem
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2011 1–3 25.0% #638 1,495 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2012 1–2 33.3% #309 1,486 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2013 4–2 66.7% #139 1,580 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2014 22–23 48.9% #39 1,852 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2015 36–26 58.1% #20 1,891 0 3
22 — — — — — — — 2016 58–24 70.7% #8 2,005 0 7
23 2016 3–8 27.3% #117 1,597 0 0 2017 47–27 63.5% #5 1,958 0 8
24 2017 2–5 28.6% #165 1,627 0 0 2018 50–21 70.4% #8 2,066 0 11
25 2018 7–5 58.3% #85 1,681 0 0 2019 48–17 73.8% #4 2,143 0 16
26 2019 1–9 10.0% #139 1,530 0 0 2020 24–7 77.4% #3 2,201 1 17
27 2020 1–5 16.7% #131 1,538 0 0 2021 8–8 50.0% #15 2,014 1 17
28 2021 6–6 50.0% #149 1,587 0 0 2022 18–16 52.9% #102 1,907 1 17
29 2022 1–3 25.0% #137 1,565 0 0 2023 19–22 46.3% #98 1,799 1 17
30 2023 3–3 50.0% #228 1,536 0 0 2024 1–9 10.0% #524 1,628 1 17
31 2024 2–2 50.0% #127 1,556 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jozef Kovalik Dominic Thiem
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 14 16 30 46.7% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 25 15 40 62.5% 25 7 32 78.1% 8 2 10 80.0%
23 2016 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2017 21 19 40 52.5% 22 5 27 81.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2017 2 1 3 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2018 23 11 34 67.6% 26 8 34 76.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2018 3 1 4 75.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2019 25 9 34 73.5% 23 7 30 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2019 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2020 18 5 23 78.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
27 2020 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2021 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2021 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 2022 11 7 18 61.1% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — —
29 2022 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2023 6 9 15 40.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 2023 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2024 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 8 15 23 34.8% 18 29 47 38.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — 161 115 276 58.3% 161 74 235 68.5% 15 18 33 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 72/72 of Jozef Kovalik's and 539/544 of Dominic Thiem's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jozef Kovalik Dominic Thiem
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 4/4 4.0 2.8 48.1% 75.6% 37.4% 48.4% 86.1% 55.7% 33.4%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 3/3 5.0 3.0 61.3% 75.2% 45.6% 73.5% 38.9% 63.6% 28.9%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 6/6 5.8 2.5 54.7% 78.5% 62.7% 58.8% 39.6% 70.9% 38.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 44/45 4.4 2.9 57.3% 72.6% 50.7% 58.4% 41.6% 62.9% 37.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 62/62 5.9 2.3 56.6% 74.8% 56.2% 58.9% 35.8% 66.5% 37.1%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 80/82 5.9 2.9 61.4% 74.3% 54.1% 56.1% 40.5% 66.4% 37.4%
23 2016 11/11 3.3 3.3 61.2% 66.3% 53.3% 55.9% 38.9% 60.9% 36.7% 2017 74/74 6.1 3.1 58.8% 75.2% 52.6% 61.5% 41.3% 65.9% 38.5%
24 2017 7/7 4.4 1.7 61.6% 65.4% 47.4% 60.8% 40.5% 58.5% 34.7% 2018 70/71 7.3 3.5 58.8% 75.9% 53.3% 63.4% 39.3% 66.5% 38.4%
25 2018 12/12 3.7 1.9 61.5% 73.3% 50.5% 57.9% 33.2% 64.5% 38.6% 2019 64/65 4.8 2.1 65.8% 73.6% 56.2% 60.7% 45.4% 67.6% 38.0%
26 2019 10/10 3.2 3.9 60.5% 66.7% 44.0% 42.5% 44.0% 57.8% 29.7% 2020 31/31 7.1 2.8 63.4% 74.0% 53.5% 64.3% 43.8% 66.4% 38.0%
27 2020 6/6 4.3 3.7 54.9% 67.9% 49.6% 55.3% 35.3% 59.4% 32.4% 2021 16/16 4.6 2.6 63.9% 72.8% 54.3% 66.1% 46.9% 66.2% 36.4%
28 2021 12/12 3.0 2.8 58.7% 65.2% 45.5% 59.3% 36.9% 57.3% 38.9% 2022 34/34 4.3 2.2 63.3% 68.8% 52.8% 50.6% 35.6% 63.3% 36.5%
29 2022 4/4 2.3 2.0 70.1% 58.0% 45.3% 60.4% 38.6% 54.9% 33.1% 2023 41/41 5.4 2.9 60.8% 72.2% 52.2% 61.4% 33.1% 64.3% 34.1%
30 2023 6/6 2.0 2.2 68.5% 65.3% 50.5% 49.9% 41.1% 61.2% 37.4% 2024 10/10 5.9 3.3 58.0% 67.4% 53.0% 48.4% 38.6% 61.4% 27.8%
31 2024 4/4 4.5 4.0 64.9% 63.3% 55.6% 69.2% 36.3% 60.7% 32.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 72/72 3.4 2.8 61.6% 66.7% 48.8% 55.9% 38.2% 59.8% 35.5% — 539/544 5.7 2.8 60.4% 73.8% 53.6% 59.6% 40.4% 65.7% 37.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jozef Kovalik Dominic Thiem
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1491 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1496 112.5 -2.63 -3.33 0.753 45.1% +32 — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.02
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1487 106.1 +0.37 -3.45 0.794 48.0% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 1–1 — +0.16
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1580 124.6 +2.00 -0.38 1.319 54.2% -19 -9 — 64.3% +1.29 1–1 0–1 — +0.35
20 2013 1495 100.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1853 150.8 -0.10 +1.26 1.001 49.9% -30 -16 — 50.0% -0.09 8–8 (50%) 9–6 (60%) 104.7 -1.38
21 2014 1528 114.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1892 154.0 +1.96 +1.24 1.108 51.3% -65 +157 -301 51.8% +0.13 10–9 (53%) 17–24 (41%) 97.2 +0.34
22 2015 1511 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 2006 168.6 +3.18 +1.63 1.114 51.5% -61 +166 -227 63.5% +0.71 21–3 (88%) 20–14 (59%) 118.6 -0.64
23 2016 1598 123.9 -1.54 -0.12 0.938 48.9% +6 -2 — 34.5% -0.55 1–4 (20%) 1–6 (14%) 93.0 +0.57 2017 1959 167.8 +2.96 +2.51 1.131 52.0% -82 +337 -151 63.7% +0.80 7–12 (37%) 14–14 (50%) 93.6 +0.76
24 2017 1627 121.1 -1.89 -0.48 0.835 46.8% -42 +66 — 23.5% -1.29 2–0 1–3 (25%) — -0.45 2018 2067 169.1 +3.22 +2.98 1.147 52.2% -45 +195 -279 66.7% +0.99 14–5 (74%) 17–14 (55%) 103.1 +0.03
25 2018 1682 129.1 +0.33 +1.10 1.085 51.6% -60 +86 — 55.2% +0.34 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 102.5 +0.83 2019 2144 172.9 +3.94 +3.40 1.174 52.5% -34 +136 — 65.6% +0.78 14–3 (82%) 16–12 (57%) 111.2 -1.32
26 2019 1531 111.2 -3.84 -3.49 0.703 44.2% 0 +141 — 12.0% -2.08 1–0 1–4 (20%) — -0.45 2020 2202 171.1 +4.24 +2.58 1.132 52.4% +10 +19 — 69.1% +1.14 7–3 (70%) 15–9 (63%) 102.9 -2.09
27 2020 1539 112.5 -1.77 -2.71 0.797 46.5% — +134 — 25.0% -1.19 — 1–3 (25%) — +0.50 2021 2015 141.5 +1.76 +0.56 1.075 51.5% +142 +122 — 52.3% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 97.8 +0.26
28 2021 1587 112.0 -3.27 +0.10 0.911 48.2% — +104 — 45.2% -0.32 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — +0.70 2022 1908 145.5 +0.24 +0.10 0.994 49.8% +149 +46 — 47.6% -0.26 10–5 (67%) 14–4 (78%) 103.9 -2.20
29 2022 1566 113.4 -2.18 -1.73 0.734 44.7% — — — 30.0% -1.50 1–1 1–0 — +0.31 2023 1800 137.0 -0.18 -1.41 0.957 49.4% +72 +55 — 47.5% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 10–10 (50%) 96.8 -1.03
30 2023 1536 111.8 -0.60 -0.64 0.963 49.6% — +123 — 53.3% -0.07 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.08 2024 1628 110.1 -2.09 -4.22 0.720 45.2% +169 +71 — 19.2% -1.54 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.8 -0.23
31 2024 1557 117.7 -0.73 +0.66 0.836 47.3% — +142 — 42.9% -0.50 1–0 2–2 (50%) — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 1499 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1759 121.7 -1.80 -0.69 0.882 47.9% -19 +101 — 36.6% -0.71 14–10 (58%) 10–24 (29%) 100.5 +2.53 — 2241 165.8 +2.25 +1.56 1.084 51.3% -20 +139 -230 58.6% +0.47 105–65 (62%) 138–117 (54%) 106.3 -1.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.