H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jozef Kovalik vs Henri Laaksonen H2H: 0-1
Henri Laaksonen holds a 1–0 lead over Jozef Kovalik in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Henri Laaksonen leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Henri Laaksonen won the 2016 Gstaad third round 3-6 6-1 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Slovakia
Age 33
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2022 | Hamburg | ATP 500 | Q1 | Clay | Jozef Kovalik | 6-4 6-1 | Henri Laaksonen | Match data |
| Jan 3, 2022 | Melbourne | ATP 250 | Q1 | Hard | Henri Laaksonen | 6-4 6-2 | Jozef Kovalik | Match data |
| Jul 21, 2016* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Henri Laaksonen | 3-6 6-1 7-6(5) | Jozef Kovalik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jozef Kovalik | #591 | #80 | 701 | 1,758 | 26 | 46 | 36.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Henri Laaksonen | #1,622 | #84 | 798 | 1,830 | 37 | 64 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jozef Kovalik | Henri Laaksonen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #244 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #318 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #165 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #85 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #139 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #131 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #104 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #149 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #137 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #98 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #228 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #172 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2024 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |