H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Juan Monaco vs Victor Hanescu H2H: 2-1
Juan Monaco holds a 2–1 lead over Victor Hanescu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Juan Monaco leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Monaco won the 2014 Gstaad third round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 42
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 44
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2014* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Juan Monaco | 6-4 7-5 | Victor Hanescu | Match data |
| Apr 28, 2010* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Victor Hanescu | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Juan Monaco | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2009* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Juan Monaco | 6-3 6-4 | Victor Hanescu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Monaco | #226 | #10 | 2,775 | 2,046 | 319 | 256 | 55.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Victor Hanescu | #1,025 | #26 | 1,671 | 1,843 | 186 | 226 | 45.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Monaco | Victor Hanescu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2004 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #73 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #70 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #92 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #23 | 1,864 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #35 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #46 | 1,768 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #646 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,850 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #50 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2011 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #26 | 1,932 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #48 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2012 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #12 | 1,944 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2013 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2014 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #62 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2015 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #53 | 1,811 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2016 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,864 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #122 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,805 | 0 | 8 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |