H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jurgen Melzer vs Kevin Kim H2H: 0-1
Kevin Kim holds a 1–0 lead over Jurgen Melzer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kevin Kim leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kevin Kim won the 2006 Miami Masters first round 3-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 45
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2006* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Kevin Kim | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | Jurgen Melzer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jurgen Melzer | #1,552 | #8 | 3,055 | 2,024 | 326 | 303 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Kevin Kim | #1,213 | #63 | 866 | 1,641 | 44 | 97 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jurgen Melzer | Kevin Kim | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1300 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #491 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #358 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #91 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #141 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #79 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #39 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #238 | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #52 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #219 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #41 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #101 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #34 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #101 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #28 | 1,924 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #178 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 49–25 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,998 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2011 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #33 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #117 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2012 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #29 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #245 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2013 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #27 | 1,825 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2014 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #113 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #155 | 1,750 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #306 | 1,770 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #288 | 1,703 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |