H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jurgen Melzer vs Tomas Behrend H2H: 2-0

Jurgen Melzer holds a 2–0 lead over Tomas Behrend in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jurgen Melzer leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jurgen Melzer won the 2004 U.S. Men's Clay Court Championship round of 16 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jurgen Melzer
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Tomas Behrend
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jurgen Melzer #59 6-2 6-4 Tomas Behrend #122 Match data Apr 16, 2004* R16 U.S. Men's Clay Court Championship International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Jurgen Melzer #78 6-1 6-2 6-2 Tomas Behrend #103 Match data Jan 21, 2004* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,017 331 307 51.9% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Tomas Behrend #1,008 #74 515 1,676 41 72 36.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jurgen Melzer Tomas Behrend
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,660 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,583 0 0 1997 1–1 50.0% #281 1,513 0 0
23 2004 27–23 54.0% #39 1,759 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0 1999 1–1 50.0% #119 1,522 0 0
25 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,774 0 1 2000 7–11 38.9% #142 1,524 0 0
26 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,696 0 1 2001 5–8 38.5% #129 1,610 0 0
27 2008 29–24 54.7% #34 1,800 0 1 2002 0–2 0.0% #155 1,636 0 0
28 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,927 0 2 2003 11–13 45.8% #87 1,606 0 0
29 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,985 0 3 2004 5–10 33.3% #139 1,532 0 0
30 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,797 0 3 2005 7–14 33.3% #89 1,574 0 0
31 2012 18–23 43.9% #29 1,755 0 4 2006 4–12 25.0% #204 1,456 0 0
32 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,826 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2014 14–20 41.2% #113 1,757 0 5 — — — — — — —
34 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,769 0 5 — — — — — — —
36 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5 — — — — — — —
37 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,708 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jurgen Melzer Tomas Behrend
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1999 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 2 7 9 22.2% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1997 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2004 12 12 24 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2005 10 14 24 41.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2006 9 11 20 45.0% 20 9 29 69.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
26 2007 14 14 28 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 1 4 5 20.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2008 17 15 32 53.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2009 19 15 34 55.9% 12 9 21 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2003 5 4 9 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2010 28 15 43 65.1% 17 8 25 68.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — —
30 2011 10 13 23 43.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2005 0 4 4 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 2012 14 16 30 46.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2006 1 4 5 20.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2013 19 13 32 59.4% 2 8 10 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 3 9 12 25.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 4 6 10 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2018 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 168 168 336 50.0% 120 101 221 54.3% 38 33 71 53.5% 5 5 10 50.0% — 11 24 35 31.4% 27 42 69 39.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 625/638 of Jurgen Melzer's and 109/113 of Tomas Behrend's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jurgen Melzer Tomas Behrend
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1999 2/2 5.0 8.5 40.6% 59.2% 42.2% 56.1% 65.6% 49.1% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 3/3 6.3 3.0 55.6% 64.6% 51.8% 38.5% 30.3% 59.7% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 1/2 5.0 3.0 59.4% 75.4% 41.0% 60.0% 18.2% 61.5% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 18/19 4.9 3.1 58.9% 72.7% 48.0% 53.1% 40.9% 62.5% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 29/29 6.7 4.7 56.8% 67.4% 44.1% 58.3% 41.9% 57.1% 34.6% 1997 2/2 3.5 2.0 54.4% 75.8% 51.8% 28.6% 75.0% 64.7% 43.6%
23 2004 49/50 5.2 3.3 58.1% 72.6% 49.1% 63.9% 46.6% 62.8% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2005 49/49 4.4 2.7 59.8% 68.4% 49.9% 58.8% 50.0% 60.8% 36.7% 1999 2/2 5.0 3.0 58.3% 73.0% 60.3% 66.7% 75.0% 67.1% 46.9%
25 2006 57/58 5.7 3.2 60.9% 69.3% 52.3% 62.2% 44.8% 62.5% 39.3% 2000 17/18 3.1 4.1 59.9% 66.8% 47.4% 55.1% 40.4% 58.9% 40.0%
26 2007 44/45 4.7 2.8 63.0% 67.4% 49.9% 58.3% 45.1% 61.2% 36.4% 2001 10/13 2.4 4.9 59.0% 66.2% 49.9% 64.6% 41.0% 59.4% 43.9%
27 2008 49/53 6.6 2.5 61.7% 71.5% 54.4% 57.6% 37.8% 65.0% 35.3% 2002 2/2 4.5 10.0 48.9% 65.3% 41.2% 41.7% 39.7% 53.1% 40.5%
28 2009 61/61 6.8 2.3 59.4% 73.4% 52.3% 58.8% 41.0% 64.9% 37.0% 2003 24/24 5.2 3.4 63.5% 69.3% 49.3% 58.4% 33.8% 61.8% 33.1%
29 2010 72/74 6.3 2.4 61.1% 72.2% 54.7% 59.9% 45.7% 65.3% 37.3% 2004 15/15 3.4 2.7 63.9% 68.5% 45.3% 60.4% 46.5% 60.0% 36.0%
30 2011 41/41 5.0 2.4 62.8% 68.9% 50.9% 51.6% 40.0% 62.1% 38.3% 2005 21/21 4.2 3.3 60.7% 66.4% 44.8% 56.0% 35.9% 57.8% 33.3%
31 2012 40/41 5.0 3.3 61.9% 69.0% 52.4% 52.4% 48.1% 62.4% 34.8% 2006 16/16 3.6 4.1 57.2% 66.1% 38.4% 45.6% 41.5% 54.6% 35.4%
32 2013 48/48 4.5 2.8 65.4% 67.2% 49.9% 56.8% 33.7% 61.1% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 34/34 4.1 2.6 65.4% 67.2% 50.5% 54.5% 36.3% 61.2% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 20/20 3.3 4.0 61.0% 67.3% 49.3% 60.5% 41.5% 60.4% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 6/6 2.7 2.5 67.4% 66.9% 44.8% 60.6% 51.9% 59.3% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 1/1 4.0 1.0 74.8% 56.6% 53.6% 22.2% 75.0% 55.9% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2018 1/2 3.0 2.0 79.3% 72.5% 55.6% 100.0% 25.0% 69.0% 27.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 625/638 5.4 2.9 61.2% 69.8% 51.0% 58.0% 42.8% 62.4% 36.8% — 109/113 3.9 3.7 60.6% 67.6% 46.1% 55.7% 40.4% 59.1% 36.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jurgen Melzer Tomas Behrend
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1999 1518 108.7 -0.28 +0.62 0.727 43.2% — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 1–0 — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2000 1548 113.7 -1.47 -0.74 0.846 47.2% — — — 22.2% -1.22 0–1 0–2 — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 1551 105.3 +1.50 -1.19 1.001 49.0% — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 0–3 (0%) — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 1660 130.8 +0.42 -0.51 0.980 49.6% -48 -49 — 50.0% -0.07 2–2 (50%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 1583 111.1 -3.51 -2.06 0.807 46.5% -20 -56 +87 39.0% -0.66 8–3 (73%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.49 1997 1514 111.0 +1.61 -1.15 1.237 54.3% — — — 50.0% +1.25 — 0–1 — -0.06
23 2004 1760 142.0 +0.13 +1.60 1.023 50.6% -26 -102 -105 52.7% +0.22 8–8 (50%) 10–12 (45%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2005 1702 137.8 -0.93 +0.15 0.938 49.4% -35 +36 -24 50.0% -0.11 10–12 (45%) 8–9 (47%) — -0.88 1999 1523 112.3 +1.90 +0.07 1.426 57.4% — — — 60.0% +1.20 0–1 — — +0.03
25 2006 1774 133.3 +0.02 +1.44 1.047 51.0% -104 +59 -110 52.9% +0.07 11–13 (46%) 13–9 (59%) — -0.50 2000 1525 113.6 -2.41 +0.56 0.973 49.4% +13 +21 — 40.4% -0.45 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) — +1.17
26 2007 1696 137.3 -1.21 +0.32 0.940 48.9% -11 +74 — 48.1% -0.22 9–7 (56%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.10 2001 1611 124.0 -1.00 +2.40 1.082 51.4% -37 +15 — 40.6% -0.56 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.43
27 2008 1800 138.7 +1.21 -0.83 1.009 50.0% -22 -35 -116 52.4% +0.11 13–8 (62%) 13–15 (46%) — +0.86 2002 1636 112.6 -0.96 +1.05 0.863 46.6% — — — 25.0% -1.75 0–1 1–0 — -0.36
28 2009 1927 151.7 +1.63 +0.96 1.054 50.8% -29 -86 -117 55.1% +0.14 8–8 (50%) 14–8 (64%) — -1.10 2003 1607 117.9 -0.87 -3.14 0.867 47.7% -15 +27 — 42.4% -0.66 5–2 (71%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.34
29 2010 1986 158.2 +2.39 +1.03 1.076 51.1% -20 -6 -97 59.0% +0.57 15–7 (68%) 19–21 (48%) — +1.32 2004 1533 112.2 -1.44 -1.11 0.900 48.4% — +39 — 35.3% -0.71 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.65
30 2011 1797 152.8 -0.17 +0.99 1.011 50.3% +17 +143 +139 52.0% +0.28 4–6 (40%) 6–7 (46%) — +1.81 2005 1574 122.5 -3.27 -2.47 0.791 45.9% -48 +94 — 32.1% -1.11 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.90
31 2012 1755 145.9 -0.78 -0.89 0.925 48.7% +20 +103 +111 44.8% -0.47 9–7 (56%) 13–7 (65%) — +1.18 2006 1456 100.7 -5.32 -3.59 0.781 45.4% +26 +106 — 30.6% -1.36 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — +1.40
32 2013 1827 141.2 -1.23 -0.76 0.919 48.3% +22 -130 +72 47.5% -0.28 10–6 (63%) 8–10 (44%) — +2.36 2007 1459 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 1757 141.1 -1.73 +1.12 0.955 49.1% +3 -5 +127 41.2% -0.46 6–7 (46%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 1750 127.3 -2.36 -0.42 0.914 48.8% +47 -54 — 44.7% -0.40 1–1 5–8 (38%) — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 1770 130.7 -0.27 +1.24 0.995 50.5% +16 -37 — 60.0% +0.13 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 1732 123.5 +3.00 +7.41 0.704 43.9% — — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2018 1708 119.9 -1.35 +6.34 0.890 49.7% — — — 100.0% +1.50 — 1–0 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2019 1689 101.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2017 147.6 -0.10 +0.36 0.981 49.7% -14 -4 -12 50.4% -0.03 116–99 (54%) 134–143 (48%) 100.2 +0.42 — 1676 120.6 -2.22 -1.54 0.892 48.0% -11 +52 — 37.4% -0.77 16–17 (48%) 16–18 (47%) 102.9 +1.63

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.