H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Karel Novacek vs Ronald Agenor H2H: 4-0
Karel Novacek holds a 4–0 lead over Ronald Agenor in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Karel Novacek leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Karel Novacek won the 1993 Roland Garros first round 7-6(4) 6-2 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
HAI
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 1993* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Karel Novacek | 7-6(4) 6-2 7-6(6) | Ronald Agenor | Match data |
| Feb 28, 1991* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Karel Novacek | 6-3 6-1 | Ronald Agenor | Match data |
| Feb 7, 1991* | Milan | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Karel Novacek | 6-4 6-2 | Ronald Agenor | Match data |
| May 18, 1985* | Madrid | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Karel Novacek | 7-6 4-6 6-3 | Ronald Agenor | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karel Novacek | #1,345 | #8 | 1,754 | 1,997 | 287 | 231 | 55.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 13 |
| Ronald Agenor | #1,507 | #22 | 984 | 1,895 | 215 | 251 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karel Novacek | Ronald Agenor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1984 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #49 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #74 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #76 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #127 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #28 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #74 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #37 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #34 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #29 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1991 | 56–29 | 65.9% | #8 | 1,845 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 16–27 | 37.2% | #74 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1992 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #23 | 1,819 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #132 | 1,538 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1993 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,760 | 0 | 12 | 1993 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #58 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1994 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,788 | 0 | 13 | 1994 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #121 | 1,595 | 0 | 13 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #409 | 1,580 | 0 | 13 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,528 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #96 | 1,522 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #137 | 1,430 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,466 | 0 | 3 |