H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Karen Khachanov vs Michael Mmoh H2H: 0-2
Michael Mmoh holds a 2–0 lead over Karen Khachanov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Michael Mmoh leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michael Mmoh won the 2026 Bank of China Hong Kong Tennis Open fourth round 7-6(2) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
United States
Age 28
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2026* | Bank of China Hong Kong Tennis Open | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Michael Mmoh | 7-6(2) 7-6(4) | Karen Khachanov | Match data |
| Aug 30, 2023* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Michael Mmoh | 6-2 6-4 6-2 | Karen Khachanov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karen Khachanov | #26 | #8 | 3,280 | 2,096 | 312 | 229 | 57.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| Michael Mmoh | #188 | #81 | 734 | 1,775 | 33 | 45 | 42.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karen Khachanov | Michael Mmoh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #451 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #53 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #45 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #11 | 2,096 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #174 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #17 | 1,909 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #239 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #113 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #29 | 1,877 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #105 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #317 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #15 | 1,959 | 0 | 5 | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #287 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #19 | 1,938 | 0 | 7 | 2026 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #188 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |