H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Karl Meiler vs Ray Ruffels H2H: 1-0

Karl Meiler holds a 1–0 lead over Ray Ruffels in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Karl Meiler leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Karl Meiler won the 1976 Wimbledon round of 64 6-8 6-2 6-4 8-9 8-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Karl Meiler
GER Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Ray Ruffels
AUS Age 80 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Karl Meiler #36 6-8 6-2 6-4 8-9 8-6 Ray Ruffels #61 Match data Jun 25, 1976* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Karl Meiler #920 #20 0 1,903 254 191 57.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Ray Ruffels #482 #27 0 1,905 246 205 54.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Karl Meiler Ray Ruffels
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1968 5–3 62.5% — 1,557 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1970 5–6 45.5% — 1,557 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1971 1–5 16.7% — 1,503 0 0 1968 41–19 68.3% — 1,721 0 1
23 1972 16–6 72.7% — 1,735 0 1 1969 35–21 62.5% — 1,757 0 2
24 1973 47–28 62.7% #32 1,807 0 1 1970 35–22 61.4% — 1,785 0 3
25 1974 42–26 61.8% #67 1,780 0 3 1971 32–32 50.0% — 1,826 0 3
26 1975 47–24 66.2% #31 1,844 0 3 1972 19–22 46.3% — 1,797 0 4
27 1976 26–23 53.1% #54 1,823 0 3 1973 1–1 50.0% #141 1,777 0 4
28 1977 34–22 60.7% #34 1,773 0 4 1974 17–18 48.6% #76 1,756 0 4
29 1978 8–12 40.0% #127 1,693 0 4 1975 16–22 42.1% #112 1,713 0 4
30 1979 8–9 47.1% #169 1,652 0 4 1976 34–20 63.0% #27 1,791 0 5
31 1980 0–4 0.0% #238 1,602 0 4 1977 12–17 41.4% #79 1,702 0 5
32 1981 3–6 33.3% — 1,575 0 4 1978 3–6 33.3% #279 1,620 0 5
33 1982 5–9 35.7% — 1,553 0 4 1979 0–4 0.0% #480 1,546 0 5
34 1983 4–6 40.0% #142 1,562 0 4 1980 1–1 50.0% #482 1,541 0 5
35 1984 2–1 66.7% #180 1,587 0 4 — — — — — — —
36 1985 1–1 50.0% #452 1,590 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Karl Meiler Ray Ruffels
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1968 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1970 — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1971 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1968 3 3 6 50.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 21 6 27 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1972 — — — — 10 3 13 76.9% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1969 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 25 10 35 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1973 16 8 24 66.7% 14 9 23 60.9% 11 7 18 61.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 1970 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 20 7 27 74.1% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1974 4 4 8 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 27 8 35 77.1% 1971 8 9 17 47.1% 14 11 25 56.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 7 13 46.2%
26 1975 10 5 15 66.7% 24 11 35 68.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 1972 5 7 12 41.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 3 10 13 23.1%
27 1976 — — — — 20 14 34 58.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 8 12 33.3% 1973 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1977 11 6 17 64.7% 13 11 24 54.2% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1974 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 7 10 30.0%
29 1978 4 4 8 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1975 3 8 11 27.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 5 5 10 50.0%
30 1979 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1976 16 6 22 72.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 9 5 14 64.3% 6 5 11 54.5%
31 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1977 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 1981 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
33 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1979 — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 1984 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1985 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 54 42 96 56.2% 112 91 203 55.2% 29 23 52 55.8% 59 35 94 62.8% — 51 56 107 47.7% 61 49 110 55.5% 110 58 168 65.5% 24 42 66 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Karl Meiler Ray Ruffels
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1968 1558 115.1 — — — — +30 -6 — 56.5% +0.96 2–1 (67%) — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1970 1557 112.1 — — — — — +1 — 37.5% -0.54 1–1 — — +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1971 1503 110.6 — — — — — +12 — 38.5% -0.73 0–2 — — +0.20 1968 1721 125.7 — — — — -212 -127 +147 64.1% +1.22 7–5 (58%) — — +3.54
23 1972 1735 126.9 — — — — — +25 -133 63.0% +0.77 6–2 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — +1.06 1969 1757 128.5 — — — — -210 -159 +156 58.9% +0.65 3–5 (38%) — — +3.43
24 1973 1808 138.6 — — — — +48 -38 -108 60.2% +0.59 8–7 (53%) 14–10 (58%) — +1.89 1970 1785 133.3 — — — — -187 -80 +164 58.6% +0.31 9–9 (50%) 8–3 (73%) — -1.28
25 1974 1781 133.9 — — — — +117 -40 -180 59.3% +0.67 10–9 (53%) 11–6 (65%) — +5.92 1971 1826 146.5 — — — — -57 -12 +37 52.6% +0.14 11–9 (55%) 12–9 (57%) — -7.83
26 1975 1844 144.1 — — — — -10 +48 — 61.6% +0.81 11–8 (58%) 11–10 (52%) — +3.64 1972 1798 141.9 — — — — -97 +17 +138 52.0% +0.14 7–5 (58%) 4–5 (44%) — -4.35
27 1976 1824 149.0 — — — — -81 +47 -190 51.8% +0.07 7–7 (50%) 7–1 (88%) — -2.00 1973 1778 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.03
28 1977 1773 135.9 — — — — +35 -3 -72 56.8% +0.40 8–7 (53%) 13–8 (62%) — +2.77 1974 1757 135.8 — — — — -100 +47 +162 45.8% -0.10 8–3 (73%) 8–4 (67%) — -1.39
29 1978 1693 122.2 — — — — +90 -46 — 44.4% -0.31 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.55 1975 1714 143.7 — — — — -30 -20 +159 50.5% +0.31 3–11 (21%) 9–11 (45%) — -1.61
30 1979 1652 122.6 — — — — +81 -2 — 46.3% -0.10 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +1.30 1976 1792 139.1 — — — — +77 -171 +107 61.3% +0.85 12–9 (57%) 8–12 (40%) — +5.63
31 1980 1603 104.0 — — — — — -1 — 11.1% -2.11 0–1 0–1 — -0.31 1977 1703 119.9 — — — — -6 -71 +90 49.4% -0.08 2–9 (18%) 8–4 (67%) — +1.49
32 1981 1576 109.5 — — — — +97 — — 36.4% -0.91 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.89 1978 1621 105.7 — — — — — +20 +87 39.1% -0.57 0–2 — — +0.98
33 1982 1554 114.1 — — — — +51 +20 — 45.7% -0.14 1–6 (14%) 2–3 (40%) — +1.04 1979 1546 95.1 — — — — — — +75 10.0% -2.90 0–1 1–0 — +0.63
34 1983 1563 111.8 — — — — +37 +9 — 41.7% -0.79 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.18 1980 1541 101.9 — — — — — — — 60.0% +1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.41
35 1984 1588 108.2 — — — — — +17 — 71.4% +0.57 0–1 2–0 — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1985 1591 101.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.34 1–1 — — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1903 139.8 — — — — +49 +9 -119 55.3% +0.35 62–62 (50%) 66–47 (58%) 102.2 +4.05 — 1906 139.6 — — — — -63 -70 +135 55.3% +0.40 62–69 (47%) 58–49 (54%) 99.8 -0.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.