H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Kenneth Carlsen vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 1-1

Kenneth Carlsen and Jurgen Melzer are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jurgen Melzer leads 1–0 on clay, while Kenneth Carlsen leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kenneth Carlsen won the 2004 San Jose third round 6-3 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kenneth Carlsen
DEN Age 53 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Jurgen Melzer
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 12, 2004* San Jose ATP 250 R32 Hard Kenneth Carlsen #91 6-3 4-6 6-3 Jurgen Melzer #76 Match data
Apr 25, 2003* Houston ATP 250 R16 Clay Jurgen Melzer #102 5-7 6-3 6-4 Kenneth Carlsen #67 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kenneth Carlsen #1,158 #41 791 1,754 239 273 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,024 326 303 51.8% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kenneth Carlsen Jurgen Melzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0
19 1992 10–7 58.8% #69 1,587 0 0 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 1993 17–27 38.6% #92 1,575 0 0 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0
21 1994 20–21 48.8% #108 1,625 0 0 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,659 0 0
22 1995 25–22 53.2% #72 1,693 0 0 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,584 0 0
23 1996 17–22 43.6% #73 1,620 0 0 2004 27–22 55.1% #39 1,769 0 0
24 1997 24–26 48.0% #75 1,654 0 0 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0
25 1998 22–23 48.9% #83 1,621 0 1 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,780 0 1
26 1999 19–19 50.0% #85 1,657 0 1 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,695 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2008 26–23 53.1% #34 1,778 0 1
28 2001 9–7 56.2% #153 1,679 0 1 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,924 0 2
29 2002 16–14 53.3% #65 1,743 0 2 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,998 0 3
30 2003 13–22 37.1% #108 1,595 0 2 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,799 0 3
31 2004 15–19 44.1% #84 1,650 0 2 2012 18–22 45.0% #29 1,758 0 4
32 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,581 0 3 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,825 0 5
33 2006 15–18 45.5% #137 1,609 0 3 2014 12–19 38.7% #113 1,758 0 5
34 2007 0–1 0.0% #498 1,487 0 3 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,770 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 — — — — — — — 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,703 0 5