H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Liam Broady vs Diego Schwartzman H2H: 1-1
Liam Broady and Diego Schwartzman are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Liam Broady won the 2022 Wimbledon second round 6-2 4-6 0-6 7-6(6) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Great Britain
Age 32
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Argentina
Age 33
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2022* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Liam Broady | 6-2 4-6 0-6 7-6(6) 6-1 | Diego Schwartzman | Match data |
| Jul 1, 2021* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Diego Schwartzman | 4-6 6-2 6-1 6-4 | Liam Broady | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liam Broady | #198 | #93 | 657 | 1,725 | 19 | 33 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Diego Schwartzman | #879 | #8 | 3,765 | 2,047 | 238 | 211 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Liam Broady | Diego Schwartzman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #885 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #117 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #301 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #61 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #88 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #273 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #26 | 1,963 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #17 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #14 | 1,953 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #128 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #9 | 2,001 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2022 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #163 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #13 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2023 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #25 | 1,801 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2024 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #546 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #114 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #884 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 |