H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Liam Broady vs Milos Raonic H2H: 0-1
Milos Raonic holds a 1–0 lead over Liam Broady in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Milos Raonic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2018 Wimbledon first round 7-5 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Great Britain
Age 32
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2018* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Milos Raonic | 7-5 6-0 6-1 | Liam Broady | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liam Broady | #198 | #93 | 657 | 1,725 | 19 | 33 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Liam Broady | Milos Raonic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #885 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #301 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #273 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #128 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2022 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #163 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2023 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2024 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #546 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 |