H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Luca Vanni vs Thiemo de Bakker H2H: 1-0
Luca Vanni holds a 1–0 lead over Thiemo de Bakker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Luca Vanni leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Luca Vanni won the 2015 Sao Paulo fourth round 7-6(5) 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 41
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 37
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2015 | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Clay | Thiemo de Bakker | 7-5 0-6 6-4 | Luca Vanni | Match data |
| Feb 13, 2015* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Luca Vanni | 7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | Thiemo de Bakker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luca Vanni | #1,468 | #100 | 560 | 1,668 | 5 | 18 | 21.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thiemo de Bakker | #1,382 | #40 | 1,010 | 1,853 | 54 | 80 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Luca Vanni | Thiemo de Bakker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #464 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #444 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #249 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #223 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #146 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #144 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #99 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #257 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #106 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #511 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2016 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #157 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |