H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Lucas Pouille vs Marco Chiudinelli H2H: 1-0
Lucas Pouille holds a 1–0 lead over Marco Chiudinelli in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lucas Pouille leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lucas Pouille won the 2016 US Open second round 4-6 3-6 7-6(6) 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 44
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2016* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Lucas Pouille | 4-6 3-6 7-6(6) 6-2 6-0 | Marco Chiudinelli | Match data |
| Jun 8, 2015 | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | Q1 | Grass | Marco Chiudinelli | 6-2 6-2 | Lucas Pouille | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucas Pouille | #583 | #10 | 2,746 | 2,040 | 137 | 131 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Marco Chiudinelli | #1,153 | #52 | 816 | 1,792 | 44 | 85 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lucas Pouille | Marco Chiudinelli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #204 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #78 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #289 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #15 | 2,019 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #142 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #18 | 1,954 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #32 | 1,804 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #155 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #22 | 1,871 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #487 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #605 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #155 | 1,671 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #56 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #381 | 1,616 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #117 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #330 | 1,670 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #177 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2024 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,727 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,698 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #282 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |