H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lukas Lacko vs Marsel Ilhan H2H: 1-0
Lukas Lacko holds a 1–0 lead over Marsel Ilhan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lukas Lacko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lukas Lacko won the 2011 Zagreb third round 4-6 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 38
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
TUR
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2011* | US Open | Grand Slam | Q3 | Hard | Marsel Ilhan | 6-3 6-2 | Lukas Lacko | Match data |
| Feb 3, 2011* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Lukas Lacko | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | Marsel Ilhan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lukas Lacko | #1,505 | #44 | 917 | 1,837 | 81 | 133 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marsel Ilhan | #1,764 | #77 | 657 | 1,754 | 20 | 54 | 27.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lukas Lacko | Marsel Ilhan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #82 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #89 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #155 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #112 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #51 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #111 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #94 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #110 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #104 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #122 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #114 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #92 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #246 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #114 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #324 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #183 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #543 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #755 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |