H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Lukas Lacko vs Pere Riba H2H: 1-1
Lukas Lacko and Pere Riba are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pere Riba leads 1–0 on clay, while Lukas Lacko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lukas Lacko won the 2011 Doha third round 5-7 7-6(7) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 38
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2011* | Doha | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Lukas Lacko | 5-7 7-6(7) 7-6(4) | Pere Riba | Match data |
| May 5, 2010* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Pere Riba | 5-7 6-1 6-2 | Lukas Lacko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lukas Lacko | #1,505 | #44 | 917 | 1,837 | 81 | 133 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pere Riba | #1,502 | #65 | 761 | 1,731 | 24 | 63 | 27.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lukas Lacko | Pere Riba | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #272 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #82 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #121 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #89 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #72 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #112 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #89 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #51 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #126 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #94 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #114 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #110 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #219 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #122 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #92 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #114 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #183 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |