H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
M. Woodforde vs J. Fitzgerald H2H: 3-0
M. Woodforde holds a 3–0 lead over J. Fitzgerald in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, M. Woodforde leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, M. Woodforde won the 1990 New Haven second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 65
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 1990* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | M. Woodforde | 6-4 6-2 | J. Fitzgerald | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1990* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | M. Woodforde | 7-5 6-2 6-4 | J. Fitzgerald | Match data |
| Jan 13, 1988* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | M. Woodforde | 6-4 6-3 6-3 | J. Fitzgerald | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. Woodforde | #985 | #19 | 1,291 | 1,922 | 313 | 294 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| J. Fitzgerald | #765 | #25 | 321 | 1,857 | 230 | 221 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | M. Woodforde | J. Fitzgerald | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #305 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #127 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #181 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #60 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1988 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #43 | 1,790 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #37 | 1,786 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1990 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #91 | 1,665 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #88 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #102 | 1,654 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1992 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,778 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1994 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #43 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #117 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #188 | 1,587 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #205 | 1,610 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #46 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #166 | 1,618 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 1998 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #58 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #298 | 1,582 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #130 | 1,611 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #792 | 1,575 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #321 | 1,584 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,570 | 0 | 6 |