H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Magnus Gustafsson vs Ronald Agenor H2H: 2-2
Magnus Gustafsson and Ronald Agenor are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ronald Agenor leads 2–0 on clay, while Magnus Gustafsson leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Magnus Gustafsson won the 1994 Stuttgart Indoor third round 6-4 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 59
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
HAI
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 1994* | Stuttgart Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Magnus Gustafsson | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Ronald Agenor | Match data |
| Jun 12, 1993* | Florence | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Ronald Agenor | 6-2 6-2 | Magnus Gustafsson | Match data |
| Sep 27, 1990* | Basel | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Magnus Gustafsson | 6-1 4-6 6-3 | Ronald Agenor | Match data |
| Apr 25, 1990* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Ronald Agenor | 6-2 6-2 | Magnus Gustafsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnus Gustafsson | #681 | #10 | 2,141 | 2,012 | 394 | 252 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| Ronald Agenor | #1,507 | #22 | 984 | 1,895 | 215 | 251 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magnus Gustafsson | Ronald Agenor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #53 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #49 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #51 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #74 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #34 | 1,804 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #44 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #31 | 1,825 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #28 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #12 | 1,947 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #37 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1992 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #47 | 1,787 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #29 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1993 | 50–29 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,891 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 16–27 | 37.2% | #74 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1994 | 26–11 | 70.3% | #33 | 1,857 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #132 | 1,538 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1995 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,732 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #58 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1996 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 9 | 1994 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1997 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #37 | 1,830 | 0 | 10 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1998 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #32 | 1,874 | 0 | 12 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,528 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 1999 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #60 | 1,802 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2000 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #82 | 1,718 | 0 | 14 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #237 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 2001 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #82 | 1,695 | 0 | 14 | 1999 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #96 | 1,522 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #137 | 1,430 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,466 | 0 | 3 |