H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Magnus Larsson vs David Wheaton H2H: 2-2
Magnus Larsson and David Wheaton are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Magnus Larsson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Magnus Larsson won the 1992 Roland Garros second round 7-6(2) 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 56
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 57
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1992* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Magnus Larsson | 7-6(2) 6-4 6-1 | David Wheaton | Match data |
| Aug 22, 1991* | Long Island | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Magnus Larsson | 6-1 6-7(2) 7-6(5) | David Wheaton | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1990* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | David Wheaton | 7-6 6-4 6-2 | Magnus Larsson | Match data |
| Jan 19, 1990* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | David Wheaton | 6-3 6-2 3-6 6-1 | Magnus Larsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magnus Larsson | #1,422 | #10 | 2,222 | 2,040 | 293 | 217 | 57.5% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| David Wheaton | #874 | #12 | 1,506 | 1,984 | 231 | 190 | 54.9% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magnus Larsson | David Wheaton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #785 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #381 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #345 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #441 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #56 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #66 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #27 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #34 | 1,802 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #17 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1993 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #39 | 1,820 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #44 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1994 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #19 | 2,004 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #54 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1995 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,932 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #39 | 1,782 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1996 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #46 | 1,765 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #44 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1997 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #25 | 1,891 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #131 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1998 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #43 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #148 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #95 | 1,729 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #229 | 1,620 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2000 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #75 | 1,770 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #565 | 1,582 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,728 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #313 | 1,562 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2002 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #152 | 1,673 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #507 | 1,689 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |