Marc Gicquel
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul-Henri Mathieu | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jun 23, 2010 | H2H |
| David Ferrer | 2 | 3 | 5 | Apr 15, 2009 | H2H |
| Jarkko Nieminen | 0 | 4 | 4 | Feb 8, 2014 | H2H |
| Gilles Simon | 2 | 2 | 4 | Feb 7, 2014 | H2H |
| Andy Roddick | 0 | 4 | 4 | Sep 3, 2009 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Marc Gicquel vs Adrian Menendez Maceiras
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Marc Gicquel vs Adrian Menendez Maceiras.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
0
0 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marc Gicquel | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | Match data | May 26, 2014 | Q1 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
| Marc Gicquel | 1-6 6-1 6-1 | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | Match data | Aug 30, 2010 | Q1 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marc Gicquel | #857 | #37 | 1,448 | 1,787 | 92 | 113 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Adrian Menendez Maceiras | — | — | — | 1,644 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marc Gicquel | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #170 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #123 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #70 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #54 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #58 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #151 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #120 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Marc Gicquel | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 2002 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2015 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2017 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 5 | 12 | 17 | 29.4% | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2018 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2019 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 13 | 16 | 29 | 44.8% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 43 | 59 | 102 | 42.2% | 26 | 33 | 59 | 44.1% | 11 | 15 | 26 | 42.3% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | Career | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
Performance Progression by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Marc Gicquel | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 2002 | 2/2 | 9.0 | 1.5 | 52.9% | 72.9% | 53.5% | 87.5% | 50.0% | 63.1% | 24.8% | 2012 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 57.6% | 61.4% | 45.2% | 50.0% | 20.0% | 54.5% | 27.3% |
| 2004 | 3/3 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 60.1% | 62.3% | 54.0% | 15.7% | 35.2% | 59.0% | 36.3% | 2013 | 2/2 | 6.0 | 2.5 | 62.0% | 54.0% | 41.9% | 54.2% | 25.0% | 49.3% | 25.7% |
| 2005 | 5/5 | 4.8 | 1.8 | 63.1% | 72.8% | 48.4% | 52.4% | 44.6% | 64.0% | 41.1% | 2015 | 5/5 | 6.0 | 3.2 | 58.6% | 68.8% | 51.3% | 57.4% | 54.9% | 61.5% | 30.9% |
| 2006 | 29/29 | 6.8 | 1.6 | 54.9% | 75.8% | 50.6% | 66.8% | 37.8% | 64.1% | 36.7% | 2017 | 6/6 | 5.0 | 1.7 | 61.5% | 69.1% | 47.8% | 48.6% | 38.5% | 61.8% | 33.5% |
| 2007 | 46/46 | 6.0 | 1.9 | 57.9% | 74.2% | 50.2% | 59.6% | 38.2% | 63.8% | 34.8% | 2018 | 6/6 | 3.7 | 2.0 | 63.8% | 65.7% | 46.2% | 56.4% | 40.0% | 58.1% | 33.1% |
| 2008 | 45/45 | 6.8 | 2.2 | 58.5% | 73.2% | 49.1% | 62.8% | 43.5% | 63.2% | 36.4% | 2019 | 4/4 | 4.0 | 2.8 | 58.7% | 62.7% | 45.2% | 43.3% | 45.9% | 55.4% | 32.5% |
| 2009 | 46/46 | 5.8 | 2.8 | 55.7% | 73.1% | 51.9% | 65.3% | 39.3% | 63.8% | 37.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 17/17 | 5.4 | 2.7 | 54.0% | 69.5% | 48.9% | 50.4% | 46.6% | 59.4% | 34.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 3/3 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 53.8% | 71.8% | 52.6% | 40.3% | 27.8% | 62.6% | 28.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 1/1 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 61.4% | 72.5% | 50.0% | 42.9% | 40.0% | 63.9% | 42.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 5/5 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 53.0% | 61.9% | 43.9% | 58.1% | 39.2% | 52.9% | 27.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 3/3 | 7.7 | 1.0 | 64.8% | 77.5% | 53.7% | 53.6% | 41.9% | 69.0% | 40.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Marc Gicquel | Adrian Menendez Maceiras | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 2002 | 1501 | 101.9 | +0.60 | -0.57 | 0.672 | 47.2% | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.17 | 2007 | 1472 | 97.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 1471 | 94.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1448 | 96.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 1520 | 105.8 | -1.54 | -0.60 | 0.885 | 47.3% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.55 | 2009 | 1427 | 100.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 1544 | 107.2 | +1.50 | +0.12 | 1.141 | 52.0% | +14 | — | — | 54.5% | +0.27 | 1–0 | — | — | 0.00 | 2010 | 1407 | 101.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 1750 | 135.4 | +1.93 | -0.94 | 1.024 | 50.4% | -8 | -166 | — | 58.9% | +0.30 | 5–4 (56%) | 8–7 (53%) | 102.6 | +0.08 | 2011 | 1425 | 100.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 1711 | 135.5 | +0.72 | -1.60 | 0.962 | 49.2% | +21 | -89 | -185 | 45.9% | -0.15 | 7–6 (54%) | 9–6 (60%) | 104.0 | -0.22 | 2012 | 1499 | 98.1 | -0.33 | -2.29 | 0.600 | 41.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.01 |
| 2008 | 1697 | 134.8 | +0.16 | -0.18 | 0.988 | 49.9% | -51 | -11 | +5 | 45.9% | -0.16 | 4–8 (33%) | 10–9 (53%) | 96.8 | +0.69 | 2013 | 1574 | 109.6 | -2.38 | -2.31 | 0.508 | 38.5% | — | — | — | 16.7% | -3.17 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.10 |
| 2009 | 1718 | 138.5 | +0.34 | +0.15 | 1.022 | 50.3% | -16 | -6 | -26 | 49.1% | -0.07 | 4–8 (33%) | 6–7 (46%) | 96.3 | +0.21 | 2014 | 1563 | 107.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 1643 | 123.6 | -2.04 | -2.07 | 0.852 | 47.8% | +67 | -11 | -42 | 35.0% | -0.90 | 0–2 | 4–3 (57%) | — | -0.86 | 2015 | 1610 | 113.9 | -2.56 | -4.46 | 0.803 | 46.7% | -2 | — | — | 35.7% | -1.07 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.22 |
| 2011 | 1576 | 104.0 | -0.75 | -0.94 | 0.755 | 45.2% | — | — | — | 10.0% | -1.70 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.29 | 2016 | 1588 | 109.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 1592 | 108.8 | +2.93 | -4.09 | 1.168 | 52.6% | — | — | — | 33.3% | +0.33 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.07 | 2017 | 1607 | 112.5 | -1.85 | -1.76 | 0.877 | 47.9% | +51 | — | — | 43.8% | -0.69 | 0–2 | 3–2 (60%) | — | +0.66 |
| 2013 | 1621 | 111.9 | -3.55 | -2.25 | 0.591 | 41.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.08 | — | 0–2 | — | +0.06 | 2018 | 1604 | 116.5 | -2.99 | -1.63 | 0.789 | 46.5% | +59 | — | — | 40.0% | -1.33 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 100.4 | +0.09 |
| 2014 | 1640 | 117.0 | +2.04 | +0.21 | 1.292 | 53.2% | +39 | — | — | 71.4% | +0.86 | 0–1 | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.13 | 2019 | 1598 | 111.3 | -3.29 | -1.62 | 0.729 | 44.2% | — | — | — | 30.0% | -1.10 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.06 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1584 | 101.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1558 | 98.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1787 | 131.8 | +0.34 | -0.77 | 0.970 | 49.5% | -4 | -57 | -51 | 46.1% | -0.22 | 22–30 (42%) | 40–38 (51%) | 99.1 | +0.38 | Career | 1645 | 111.3 | -2.50 | -2.33 | 0.764 | 45.6% | +38 | — | — | 34.4% | -1.33 | 3–8 (27%) | 9–7 (56%) | 98.7 | +3.83 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Adrian Menendez Maceiras
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremy Chardy | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 7, 2019 | — |
| Taro Daniel | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 12, 2019 | — |
| Fernando Verdasco | 1 | 0 | 1 | Apr 11, 2019 | — |
| Christopher Eubanks | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 14, 2019 | — |
| Denis Shapovalov | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 20, 2018 | — |