H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Marcelo Rios vs Richard Fromberg H2H: 1-0
Marcelo Rios holds a 1–0 lead over Richard Fromberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marcelo Rios leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 1998 Auckland final 4-6 6-4 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 50
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 1998* | Auckland | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 4-6 6-4 7-6(3) | Richard Fromberg | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Rios | #994 | #1 | 3,719 | 2,137 | 366 | 179 | 67.2% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18 |
| Richard Fromberg | #997 | #24 | 1,214 | 1,823 | 247 | 282 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcelo Rios | Richard Fromberg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 52–25 | 67.5% | #11 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #32 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1998 | 66–18 | 78.6% | #2 | 1,948 | 0 | 12 | 1992 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1999 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 15 | 1993 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #37 | 1,813 | 0 | 16 | 1994 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #58 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #39 | 1,836 | 0 | 18 | 1995 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #85 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2002 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #24 | 1,820 | 0 | 18 | 1996 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2003 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #105 | 1,809 | 0 | 18 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #77 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #40 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #78 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #84 | 1,633 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #309 | 1,502 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #727 | 1,486 | 0 | 4 |