H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marcelo Rios vs Sergi Bruguera H2H: 2-1
Marcelo Rios holds a 2–1 lead over Sergi Bruguera in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marcelo Rios leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Sergi Bruguera won the 2000 Hong Kong fourth round 2-6 7-6(2) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 50
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2000* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Sergi Bruguera | 2-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | Marcelo Rios | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1997* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 7-5 6-2 6-4 | Sergi Bruguera | Match data |
| Feb 15, 1997* | Marseille | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | Sergi Bruguera | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Rios | #994 | #1 | 3,719 | 2,137 | 366 | 179 | 67.2% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18 |
| Sergi Bruguera | #668 | #3 | 3,007 | 2,101 | 414 | 255 | 61.9% | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marcelo Rios | Sergi Bruguera | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #333 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #26 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #28 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 52–25 | 67.5% | #11 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 49–22 | 69.0% | #11 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #16 | 1,858 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 1998 | 66–18 | 78.6% | #2 | 1,948 | 0 | 12 | 1993 | 60–23 | 72.3% | #4 | 1,915 | 1 | 11 |
| 23 | 1999 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 15 | 1994 | 60–23 | 72.3% | #4 | 1,939 | 2 | 14 |
| 24 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #37 | 1,813 | 0 | 16 | 1995 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #13 | 1,842 | 2 | 14 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #39 | 1,836 | 0 | 18 | 1996 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,756 | 2 | 14 |
| 26 | 2002 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #24 | 1,820 | 0 | 18 | 1997 | 49–28 | 63.6% | #8 | 1,786 | 2 | 14 |
| 27 | 2003 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #105 | 1,809 | 0 | 18 | 1998 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,610 | 2 | 14 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,595 | 2 | 14 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #85 | 1,662 | 2 | 14 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #108 | 1,577 | 2 | 14 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #290 | 1,553 | 2 | 14 |