H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Marco Cecchinato vs Martin Klizan H2H: 1-0
Marco Cecchinato holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Klizan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marco Cecchinato leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marco Cecchinato won the 2019 Munich fourth round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 33
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Slovakia
Age 37
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2019* | Munich | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Marco Cecchinato | 6-1 6-3 | Martin Klizan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marco Cecchinato | #175 | #16 | 2,091 | 1,903 | 79 | 128 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Martin Klizan | #831 | #24 | 1,445 | 1,979 | 128 | 146 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marco Cecchinato | Martin Klizan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #395 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #155 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2016 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #187 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #20 | 1,771 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #43 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2019 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #35 | 1,750 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2020 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #80 | 1,764 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #141 | 1,755 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2021 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #100 | 1,679 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #41 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2022 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #101 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,703 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2023 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #198 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,649 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,544 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #835 | 1,556 | 0 | 6 |