H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Marco Cecchinato vs Max Purcell H2H: 0-1
Max Purcell holds a 1–0 lead over Marco Cecchinato in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Max Purcell leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Max Purcell won the 2023 Winston-Salem second round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 33
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 28
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2023* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Max Purcell | 6-4 6-1 | Marco Cecchinato | Match data |
| Jan 16, 2023 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q1 | Hard | Max Purcell | 6-2 3-2 (ret.) | Marco Cecchinato | Match data |
| Apr 25, 2022 | Estoril | ATP 250 | Q1 | Clay | Max Purcell | 7-6(1) 4-6 6-3 | Marco Cecchinato | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marco Cecchinato | #175 | #16 | 2,091 | 1,903 | 79 | 128 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Max Purcell | #650 | #40 | 1,051 | 1,754 | 31 | 49 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marco Cecchinato | Max Purcell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #187 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #176 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #20 | 1,771 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #45 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #105 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #80 | 1,764 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2021 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #100 | 1,679 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #101 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #198 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,544 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |