H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Marco Chiudinelli vs Danai Udomchoke H2H: 0-1

Danai Udomchoke holds a 1–0 lead over Marco Chiudinelli in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Danai Udomchoke leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Danai Udomchoke won the 2006 China Open round of 32 0-6 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marco Chiudinelli
SUI Age 44 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Danai Udomchoke
THA Age 45 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Danai Udomchoke #122 0-6 6-2 6-3 Marco Chiudinelli #188 Match data Sep 14, 2006* R32 China Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marco Chiudinelli #1,153 #52 816 1,794 44 85 34.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Danai Udomchoke #1,207 #77 646 1,631 18 52 25.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marco Chiudinelli Danai Udomchoke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2001 2–1 66.7% #283 1,509 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #211 1,489 0 0
21 2003 0–1 0.0% #289 1,439 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #162 1,437 0 0
22 2004 4–7 36.4% #142 1,467 0 0 2004 0–3 0.0% #204 1,488 0 0
23 2005 1–2 33.3% #287 1,458 0 0 2005 2–4 33.3% #121 1,562 0 0
24 2006 4–5 44.4% #155 1,573 0 0 2006 6–12 33.3% #104 1,563 0 0
25 2007 1–3 25.0% #487 1,578 0 0 2007 7–19 26.9% #154 1,498 0 0
26 2008 0–1 0.0% #605 1,570 0 0 2008 0–2 0.0% #152 1,525 0 0
27 2009 10–11 47.6% #56 1,778 0 0 2009 0–5 0.0% #162 1,501 0 0
28 2010 14–25 35.9% #117 1,664 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #457 1,480 0 0
29 2011 2–4 33.3% #177 1,655 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #210 1,507 0 0
30 2012 4–8 33.3% #146 1,690 0 0 2012 0–2 0.0% #149 1,523 0 0
31 2013 0–4 0.0% #173 1,641 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2014 0–3 0.0% #211 1,562 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2015 1–3 25.0% #282 1,593 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2016 3–4 42.9% #120 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2017 0–4 0.0% #418 1,520 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marco Chiudinelli Danai Udomchoke
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2004 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2006 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
25 2007 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 4 11 15 26.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
26 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2009 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2010 7 14 21 33.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2011 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 30 59 89 33.7% 7 15 22 31.8% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — 13 37 50 26.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 11 16 31.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marco Chiudinelli Danai Udomchoke
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 3/3 3.3 2.3 60.2% 71.8% 45.1% 57.4% 41.1% 61.0% 36.5%
21 2003 1/1 3.0 2.0 53.8% 71.4% 45.2% 60.0% 66.7% 59.3% 25.0% 2003 1/1 2.0 2.0 56.6% 50.0% 39.1% 58.3% 50.0% 45.3% 34.0%
22 2004 11/11 4.4 4.5 58.0% 70.6% 48.8% 57.0% 48.9% 60.6% 35.0% 2004 3/3 1.3 3.7 62.5% 59.7% 47.9% 49.9% 31.5% 54.9% 37.9%
23 2005 3/3 3.7 2.0 68.2% 66.0% 41.5% 47.2% 62.5% 57.9% 28.4% 2005 6/6 2.7 4.3 58.4% 65.1% 50.3% 58.0% 48.6% 58.3% 36.2%
24 2006 9/9 5.8 2.4 56.3% 69.7% 53.7% 60.3% 44.1% 62.7% 37.3% 2006 18/18 4.3 3.5 63.0% 69.5% 42.7% 62.0% 29.5% 60.0% 35.9%
25 2007 4/4 3.8 1.8 57.3% 63.6% 48.0% 47.6% 55.6% 57.1% 39.5% 2007 26/26 3.3 3.8 59.9% 67.8% 47.9% 49.2% 39.3% 59.6% 35.4%
26 2008 1/1 4.0 2.0 56.8% 85.2% 46.3% 100.0% 0.0% 68.4% 25.0% 2008 2/2 5.5 7.0 66.4% 56.0% 37.9% 49.4% 45.0% 49.9% 34.3%
27 2009 21/21 5.1 2.0 62.1% 72.0% 52.8% 66.5% 37.0% 64.9% 33.9% 2009 5/5 3.4 3.0 61.2% 67.1% 42.4% 62.1% 40.0% 57.5% 30.2%
28 2010 39/39 4.1 3.5 59.8% 69.6% 50.8% 57.8% 32.5% 61.8% 33.8% 2010 1/1 0.0 2.0 65.4% 64.7% 38.9% 57.1% 0.0% 55.8% 27.5%
29 2011 6/6 3.2 1.8 65.8% 66.0% 50.6% 50.6% 42.7% 60.8% 33.2% 2011 2/2 2.0 3.0 64.4% 64.0% 45.6% 52.3% 56.3% 57.7% 40.5%
30 2012 12/12 2.6 2.8 60.9% 68.4% 51.0% 60.6% 20.1% 61.7% 31.1% 2012 2/2 4.5 3.5 63.3% 60.0% 44.8% 43.4% 47.7% 54.5% 33.5%
31 2013 4/4 4.3 4.3 61.0% 69.4% 44.7% 72.5% 38.5% 59.7% 33.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 3/3 6.0 3.0 59.4% 69.3% 51.0% 63.7% 61.7% 61.8% 32.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 4/4 2.8 1.8 63.3% 63.6% 50.7% 47.0% 28.2% 58.7% 27.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 7/7 3.4 2.9 57.3% 75.2% 50.9% 40.8% 53.1% 64.2% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 4/4 4.5 2.5 56.4% 67.9% 42.2% 44.3% 30.2% 57.2% 29.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 129/129 4.2 2.9 60.1% 69.7% 50.3% 58.0% 38.0% 61.8% 33.4% — 69/70 3.4 3.6 61.2% 66.8% 45.5% 54.8% 37.8% 58.5% 35.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marco Chiudinelli Danai Udomchoke
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1511 104.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1509 104.7 -0.29 -0.14 0.936 49.8% +18 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 — — +0.29
20 2002 1474 94.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1489 101.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.07
21 2003 1439 97.8 -0.61 -0.72 0.615 44.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.08 2003 1438 91.4 +0.50 -1.38 0.622 40.0% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.10
22 2004 1468 108.7 -1.77 -2.04 0.889 48.5% +28 — — 45.8% -0.25 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.44 2004 1489 108.9 -1.95 -0.64 0.840 46.7% +25 — — 12.5% -1.63 0–1 — — -0.11
23 2005 1458 105.0 -1.77 -3.00 0.674 44.2% +22 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — +0.01 2005 1563 118.8 -1.66 -0.22 0.869 47.6% -47 — — 36.8% -0.89 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.36
24 2006 1573 115.4 -0.19 -0.22 1.001 50.4% -21 — — 51.9% +0.19 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.01 2006 1564 116.2 -2.69 -0.23 0.899 48.1% +6 — +5 31.7% -1.10 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.02
25 2007 1578 116.6 -5.08 +2.96 0.920 49.2% -1 — — 36.4% -0.45 0–1 — — +0.02 2007 1499 113.6 -3.16 -1.20 0.876 47.4% +15 -71 +50 37.5% -0.94 2–8 (20%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.93
26 2008 1571 105.2 -3.40 +1.97 0.792 48.0% — — — 0.0% -1.00 — 0–2 — -0.12 2008 1525 106.5 -3.90 -1.95 0.684 42.5% — — — 33.3% -2.67 0–2 1–0 — +0.02
27 2009 1778 135.7 +1.09 -0.54 0.968 49.7% +21 — — 46.3% -0.15 5–3 (63%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.15 2009 1501 108.8 -2.60 -1.67 0.711 44.3% +41 — — 0.0% -2.64 — 0–2 — +0.11
28 2010 1665 136.6 -0.93 -1.79 0.884 48.1% +18 -79 -157 39.8% -0.60 4–5 (44%) 9–7 (56%) — -1.76 2010 1480 100.3 -0.48 +0.05 0.621 41.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.02
29 2011 1656 124.7 -0.04 -0.62 0.846 47.3% +50 — — 33.3% -0.80 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.19 2011 1508 106.0 -0.56 -1.62 0.959 49.1% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.21
30 2012 1691 127.0 -0.47 -3.01 0.811 46.4% +54 — — 30.8% -1.12 2–0 1–4 (20%) — -0.25 2012 1523 106.3 +0.44 -2.27 0.738 45.0% — — — 28.6% -1.71 0–1 1–0 — -0.04
31 2013 1642 115.9 -0.56 -0.75 0.819 46.7% +51 — — 20.0% -1.20 0–2 0–3 (0%) — -0.32 2013 1519 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1563 109.5 -2.26 -0.67 0.840 48.2% +74 — — 30.0% -0.50 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1593 111.5 -0.23 -3.16 0.665 43.5% — — — 22.2% -2.11 1–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.17 2015 1501 96.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1606 112.2 -1.08 -0.26 0.933 48.3% +28 — +24 47.6% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1521 102.8 -2.69 -2.17 0.688 43.9% — — — 11.1% -2.33 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1795 127.7 -0.76 -1.31 0.875 48.0% +27 -79 -79 39.0% -0.62 18–24 (43%) 32–41 (44%) 98.1 -0.92 — 1631 112.5 -2.44 -0.87 0.852 47.1% +9 -71 +31 32.2% -1.18 8–16 (33%) 12–13 (48%) 96.6 +1.40

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.