H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Marco Chiudinelli vs Dustin Brown H2H: 0-1
Dustin Brown holds a 1–0 lead over Marco Chiudinelli in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dustin Brown leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dustin Brown won the 2010 Johannesburg third round 6-4 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 44
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JAM
Age 41
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2012* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Q2 | Grass | Dustin Brown | 6-4 6-0 | Marco Chiudinelli | Match data |
| Feb 4, 2010* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Dustin Brown | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Marco Chiudinelli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marco Chiudinelli | #1,153 | #52 | 816 | 1,792 | 44 | 85 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dustin Brown | #1,058 | #64 | 778 | 1,903 | 61 | 96 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marco Chiudinelli | Dustin Brown | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #527 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #289 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #142 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #155 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #487 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #92 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #605 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #161 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #56 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #167 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #117 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #177 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #89 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #118 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #72 | 1,868 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #282 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #203 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2017 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #343 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |