H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marco Trungelliti vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Marco Trungelliti vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 36
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marco Trungelliti | #99 | #76 | 758 | 1,712 | 23 | 34 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | #1,222 | #48 | 998 | 1,809 | 95 | 169 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marco Trungelliti | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #267 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #200 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #275 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #72 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #56 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #107 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #70 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #77 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #123 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #112 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #209 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2026 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |