H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Marco Trungelliti vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Marco Trungelliti vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marco Trungelliti
Argentina Age 36 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marco Trungelliti #142 4-6 7-6(2) 6-1 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #155 Match data Aug 27, 2018 Q1 Q US Open Grand Slam Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marco Trungelliti #83 #76 758 1,712 26 36 41.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marco Trungelliti Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
22 2012 1–1 50.0% #200 1,533 0 0 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2013 1–1 50.0% #275 1,516 0 0 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2016 2–4 33.3% #146 1,546 0 0 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2017 1–2 33.3% #220 1,581 0 0 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2018 5–3 62.5% #123 1,673 0 0 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0
29 2019 2–3 40.0% #209 1,604 0 0 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0
30 2020 0–1 0.0% #241 1,585 0 0 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0
31 2021 1–2 33.3% #199 1,670 0 0 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0
32 2022 0–2 0.0% #223 1,667 0 0 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0
33 2023 0–1 0.0% #229 1,628 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2024 4–4 50.0% #143 1,683 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2025 0–1 0.0% #131 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2026 9–11 45.0% #83 1,665 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marco Trungelliti Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
22 2012 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
23 2013 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2016 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
27 2017 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 2018 — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2019 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — —
31 2021 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2022 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2023 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 2 1 3 66.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 4 9 13 30.8% 22 24 46 47.8% 0 3 3 0.0% — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 62/64 of Marco Trungelliti's and 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marco Trungelliti Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5%
22 2012 2/2 1.5 4.5 47.7% 60.1% 49.1% 52.7% 47.7% 53.9% 45.7% 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4%
23 2013 2/2 1.0 1.5 63.7% 64.1% 44.4% 75.2% 68.8% 56.9% 36.3% 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7%
26 2016 6/6 3.8 5.0 60.7% 66.2% 51.3% 61.0% 39.3% 60.3% 36.7% 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2%
27 2017 3/3 2.7 7.3 54.7% 59.0% 45.3% 47.1% 39.4% 53.0% 33.4% 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2018 8/8 2.9 2.8 58.7% 66.4% 49.5% 60.7% 43.0% 59.3% 40.5% 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1%
29 2019 5/5 3.2 2.6 48.3% 65.9% 47.0% 51.6% 28.8% 55.8% 32.9% 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5%
30 2020 1/1 6.0 3.0 70.0% 65.1% 48.1% 55.6% 0.0% 60.0% 27.6% 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0%
31 2021 3/3 13.0 7.7 61.1% 73.5% 45.5% 46.2% 49.3% 62.6% 35.2% 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0%
32 2022 2/2 8.0 3.0 62.3% 69.8% 43.6% 43.3% 37.5% 60.0% 33.8% 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1%
33 2023 1/1 3.0 3.0 52.9% 66.7% 50.0% 62.5% 50.0% 58.8% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 8/8 1.9 2.6 58.4% 65.4% 48.4% 67.9% 38.8% 58.4% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1/1 2.0 2.0 68.0% 72.0% 44.0% 50.0% 0.0% 63.0% 21.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 20/22 4.8 4.2 63.8% 69.4% 48.0% 61.9% 44.3% 61.7% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 62/64 4.0 3.9 59.7% 67.1% 48.0% 59.4% 41.0% 59.4% 36.2% — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marco Trungelliti Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
19 2009 1484 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11
21 2011 1459 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2012 1533 106.2 -1.23 -1.71 0.992 50.0% — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.20
23 2013 1517 107.5 +1.21 -2.32 0.842 47.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.25 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) — -1.24
24 2014 1498 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.95
25 2015 1474 103.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.72
26 2016 1546 114.5 -0.39 +0.46 0.925 48.5% 0 +64 — 42.1% -0.52 0–1 2–0 — 0.00 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.11
27 2017 1581 112.3 -3.65 -3.01 0.712 44.2% — +86 — 30.0% -1.40 1–0 1–1 — +0.72 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.22
28 2018 1674 114.2 -2.37 +0.42 0.995 49.8% — +96 — 52.4% 0.00 2–0 0–2 — +0.39 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.44
29 2019 1604 105.1 -1.69 -2.07 0.744 44.0% — +100 — 44.4% -1.22 1–0 1–0 — +0.60 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.04
30 2020 1585 102.1 -3.25 +0.42 0.689 43.1% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.02 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.22
31 2021 1671 111.6 +0.46 -2.13 0.939 49.1% — — — 42.9% -0.29 1–1 0–2 — +0.29 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07
32 2022 1668 114.7 -0.31 -0.77 0.845 47.0% — — — 37.5% -0.87 0–2 — — +0.03 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
33 2023 1628 103.0 -1.47 +4.40 0.785 45.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.24 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1684 118.8 -2.94 -2.75 0.747 46.3% — +115 — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 2–0 — -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1588 105.6 -0.14 -1.66 0.568 43.0% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 1665 124.3 -1.50 +1.64 1.003 50.5% -18 +19 — 49.1% +0.13 2–4 (33%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1713 116.4 -1.59 -0.25 0.893 48.2% -9 +68 — 42.9% -0.48 8–9 (47%) 12–14 (46%) 99.5 +3.08 — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.