H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Marco Trungelliti vs Lukas Lacko

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Marco Trungelliti vs Lukas Lacko.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marco Trungelliti
Argentina Age 36 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Lukas Lacko
SVK Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marco Trungelliti #198 6-3 6-4 Lukas Lacko #188 Match data Jan 17, 2022 Q1 Q Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marco Trungelliti #83 #76 758 1,712 26 37 41.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lukas Lacko #1,505 #44 917 1,838 81 135 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marco Trungelliti Lukas Lacko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2007 0–2 0.0% #139 1,499 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #325 1,480 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2009 1–3 25.0% #82 1,607 0 0
22 2012 1–1 50.0% #200 1,533 0 0 2010 16–21 43.2% #89 1,669 0 0
23 2013 1–1 50.0% #275 1,516 0 0 2011 4–7 36.4% #112 1,670 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2012 12–19 38.7% #51 1,644 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2013 11–16 40.7% #81 1,667 0 0
26 2016 2–4 33.3% #146 1,546 0 0 2014 11–17 39.3% #94 1,733 0 0
27 2017 1–2 33.3% #220 1,581 0 0 2015 2–12 14.3% #110 1,647 0 0
28 2018 5–3 62.5% #123 1,673 0 0 2016 4–7 36.4% #122 1,682 0 0
29 2019 2–3 40.0% #209 1,604 0 0 2017 7–10 41.2% #92 1,740 0 0
30 2020 0–1 0.0% #241 1,585 0 0 2018 11–16 40.7% #114 1,677 0 0
31 2021 1–2 33.3% #199 1,670 0 0 2019 1–3 25.0% #183 1,579 0 0
32 2022 0–2 0.0% #223 1,667 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2023 0–1 0.0% #229 1,628 0 0 2021 1–1 50.0% #190 1,497 0 0
34 2024 4–4 50.0% #143 1,683 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2025 0–1 0.0% #131 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2026 9–12 42.9% #83 1,649 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marco Trungelliti Lukas Lacko
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2012 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2013 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2011 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2016 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2017 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2015 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2018 — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2019 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2017 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 6 13 19 31.6% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5%
31 2021 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2022 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2021 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
34 2024 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 2 2 4 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 4 10 14 28.6% 22 24 46 47.8% 0 3 3 0.0% — 60 95 155 38.7% 2 14 16 12.5% 19 26 45 42.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 63/64 of Marco Trungelliti's and 215/216 of Lukas Lacko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marco Trungelliti Lukas Lacko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 3.0 3.0 58.5% 59.7% 48.3% 32.1% 8.3% 55.0% 22.6%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 8.0 7.0 54.5% 70.9% 47.0% 64.7% 28.6% 60.0% 31.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 4/4 5.5 2.0 64.4% 71.7% 48.3% 67.5% 21.5% 63.4% 24.6%
22 2012 2/2 1.5 4.5 47.7% 60.1% 49.1% 52.7% 47.7% 53.9% 45.7% 2010 37/37 6.7 2.6 58.6% 72.6% 50.4% 55.4% 41.7% 63.4% 36.0%
23 2013 2/2 1.0 1.5 63.7% 64.1% 44.4% 75.2% 68.8% 56.9% 36.3% 2011 11/11 6.2 3.4 57.9% 66.4% 48.8% 61.5% 49.0% 59.2% 32.9%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 30/31 6.3 2.0 60.2% 68.3% 49.2% 50.9% 38.9% 60.9% 34.2%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 27/27 5.7 2.8 57.8% 68.4% 48.1% 53.4% 37.5% 59.7% 35.6%
26 2016 6/6 3.8 5.0 60.7% 66.2% 51.3% 61.0% 39.3% 60.3% 36.7% 2014 28/28 4.9 2.6 57.9% 72.2% 50.4% 46.3% 46.3% 63.1% 33.4%
27 2017 3/3 2.7 7.3 54.7% 59.0% 45.3% 47.1% 39.4% 53.0% 33.4% 2015 14/14 7.6 2.4 60.6% 66.1% 48.3% 52.4% 18.2% 59.5% 28.3%
28 2018 8/8 2.9 2.8 58.7% 66.4% 49.5% 60.7% 43.0% 59.3% 40.5% 2016 11/11 5.7 3.3 56.9% 69.7% 49.9% 52.4% 53.8% 60.8% 31.2%
29 2019 5/5 3.2 2.6 48.3% 65.9% 47.0% 51.6% 28.8% 55.8% 32.9% 2017 17/17 7.2 2.2 57.4% 74.0% 56.2% 58.3% 35.3% 65.9% 33.4%
30 2020 1/1 6.0 3.0 70.0% 65.1% 48.1% 55.6% 0.0% 60.0% 27.6% 2018 27/27 8.0 3.1 57.1% 74.5% 51.2% 48.5% 37.5% 64.4% 34.5%
31 2021 3/3 13.0 7.7 61.1% 73.5% 45.5% 46.2% 49.3% 62.6% 35.2% 2019 4/4 5.3 2.3 61.2% 71.4% 49.5% 68.5% 8.3% 62.5% 28.2%
32 2022 2/2 8.0 3.0 62.3% 69.8% 43.6% 43.3% 37.5% 60.0% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1/1 3.0 3.0 52.9% 66.7% 50.0% 62.5% 50.0% 58.8% 32.3% 2021 2/2 4.0 1.5 62.4% 71.8% 63.0% 62.5% 16.7% 68.7% 32.3%
34 2024 8/8 1.9 2.6 58.4% 65.4% 48.4% 67.9% 38.8% 58.4% 31.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1/1 2.0 2.0 68.0% 72.0% 44.0% 50.0% 0.0% 63.0% 21.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 21/22 4.8 4.5 63.6% 68.9% 48.0% 61.7% 43.3% 61.3% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 63/64 4.1 4.0 59.7% 67.0% 48.0% 59.4% 40.8% 59.4% 36.1% — 215/216 6.4 2.6 58.5% 70.7% 50.3% 53.0% 38.2% 62.2% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marco Trungelliti Lukas Lacko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1483 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1484 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1499 101.9 +1.81 -2.71 0.502 39.5% — — — 16.7% -2.67 — — — +0.02
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1480 94.2 -0.69 -1.07 0.779 46.8% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.29
21 2011 1459 98.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1607 112.9 -1.36 -0.52 0.671 46.0% — — +49 30.0% -0.80 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.10
22 2012 1533 106.2 -1.23 -1.71 0.992 50.0% — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 2010 1670 135.5 +0.10 -0.24 0.982 49.4% -21 -170 -17 45.5% -0.57 6–12 (33%) 15–6 (71%) — -0.83
23 2013 1517 107.5 +1.21 -2.32 0.842 47.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.25 2011 1670 132.6 -1.32 -1.02 0.806 46.9% +1 — — 37.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.54
24 2014 1498 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1644 139.6 -1.32 -1.68 0.874 47.5% +20 -213 +119 38.6% -0.76 6–3 (67%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.47
25 2015 1474 103.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1668 139.8 -2.67 -1.18 0.882 47.9% +30 — — 45.6% -0.69 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.64
26 2016 1546 114.5 -0.39 +0.46 0.925 48.5% 0 +64 — 42.1% -0.52 0–1 2–0 — 0.00 2014 1734 137.9 -0.40 -1.90 0.904 48.4% +3 — -21 39.4% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19
27 2017 1581 112.3 -3.65 -3.01 0.712 44.2% — +86 — 30.0% -1.40 1–0 1–1 — +0.72 2015 1648 120.8 -3.25 -3.69 0.699 44.0% -38 — +63 26.2% -1.62 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.16
28 2018 1674 114.2 -2.37 +0.42 0.995 49.8% — +96 — 52.4% 0.00 2–0 0–2 — +0.39 2016 1682 124.0 -2.47 -1.63 0.798 46.8% -124 — +133 38.5% -0.69 1–0 2–3 (40%) — +0.21
29 2019 1604 105.1 -1.69 -2.07 0.744 44.0% — +100 — 44.4% -1.22 1–0 1–0 — +0.60 2017 1740 131.9 +1.11 -2.04 0.978 49.7% -14 — +51 40.5% -0.36 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.17
30 2020 1585 102.1 -3.25 +0.42 0.689 43.1% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.02 2018 1678 127.0 -0.16 -1.20 0.969 49.4% -91 — +171 43.3% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.00
31 2021 1671 111.6 +0.46 -2.13 0.939 49.1% — — — 42.9% -0.29 1–1 0–2 — +0.29 2019 1579 109.6 -3.16 -1.14 0.753 46.3% -3 — — 25.0% -1.63 — — — +0.11
32 2022 1668 114.7 -0.31 -0.77 0.845 47.0% — — — 37.5% -0.87 0–2 — — +0.03 2020 1514 93.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1628 103.0 -1.47 +4.40 0.785 45.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.24 2021 1497 101.4 +0.23 -1.99 1.032 50.8% — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 — +0.09
34 2024 1684 118.8 -2.94 -2.75 0.747 46.3% — +115 — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 2–0 — -0.32 2022 1445 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1588 105.6 -0.14 -1.66 0.568 43.0% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 1650 123.7 -1.72 +1.39 0.984 50.1% -30 +33 — 47.4% -0.04 2–4 (33%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1713 116.3 -1.66 -0.30 0.889 48.1% -17 +73 — 42.5% -0.53 8–9 (47%) 12–14 (46%) 99.5 +3.02 — 1838 133.0 -0.96 -1.44 0.886 48.0% -14 -189 +77 39.8% -0.70 28–36 (44%) 46–49 (48%) 97.9 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.