H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Marcos Daniel vs Kevin Kim H2H: 1-0

Marcos Daniel holds a 1–0 lead over Kevin Kim in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marcos Daniel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marcos Daniel won the 2006 Mexican Open round of 32 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marcos Daniel
BRA Age 48 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Kevin Kim
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marcos Daniel #88 7-5 6-3 Kevin Kim #122 Match data Mar 2, 2006* R32 Mexican Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marcos Daniel #904 #56 942 1,645 20 64 23.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kevin Kim #1,213 #63 866 1,642 44 97 31.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marcos Daniel Kevin Kim
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #195 1,468 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2000 2–5 28.6% #141 1,424 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2001 1–3 25.0% #184 1,392 0 0
23 2002 0–1 0.0% #236 1,485 0 0 2002 2–3 40.0% #238 1,430 0 0
24 2003 1–3 25.0% #169 1,504 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #219 1,453 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2004 2–3 40.0% #94 1,550 0 0
26 2005 0–2 0.0% #94 1,520 0 0 2005 19–25 43.2% #101 1,561 0 0
27 2006 5–16 23.8% #165 1,445 0 0 2006 7–18 28.0% #101 1,546 0 0
28 2007 0–2 0.0% #118 1,517 0 0 2007 3–14 17.6% #178 1,483 0 0
29 2008 6–15 28.6% #87 1,509 0 0 2008 0–3 0.0% #117 1,516 0 0
30 2009 6–12 33.3% #87 1,602 0 0 2009 7–16 30.4% #117 1,598 0 0
31 2010 2–10 16.7% #96 1,498 0 0 2010 1–3 25.0% #245 1,581 0 0
32 2011 0–3 0.0% #904 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marcos Daniel Kevin Kim
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2002 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2005 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 15 17 32 46.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2006 0 5 5 0.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 6 11 17 35.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2007 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 3 11 14 21.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2008 0 5 5 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2009 1 5 6 16.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 4 11 15 26.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
31 2010 0 3 3 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2010 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1 23 24 4.2% 18 35 53 34.0% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — 36 68 104 34.6% 3 12 15 20.0% 4 14 18 22.2% 1 3 4 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 83/84 of Marcos Daniel's and 122/122 of Kevin Kim's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marcos Daniel Kevin Kim
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 2002 1/1 2.0 1.0 49.3% 62.2% 52.6% 81.3% 100.0% 57.3% 29.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2003 4/4 3.3 3.0 64.4% 64.1% 42.5% 61.3% 58.8% 55.9% 34.7% 2003 1/1 7.0 1.0 66.2% 68.9% 52.2% 0.0% 20.0% 63.2% 37.1%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 5/5 3.6 1.4 61.4% 66.2% 47.8% 59.8% 47.0% 59.1% 37.1%
26 2005 2/2 2.0 4.0 59.2% 60.5% 53.6% 73.1% 31.3% 57.6% 27.0% 2005 44/44 6.5 3.0 60.0% 70.8% 46.9% 60.9% 41.2% 61.3% 35.8%
27 2006 21/21 3.8 1.6 65.0% 62.3% 45.2% 43.5% 49.4% 57.0% 34.8% 2006 25/25 3.3 3.6 57.7% 66.7% 48.8% 48.4% 41.2% 59.3% 35.9%
28 2007 2/2 1.5 2.0 59.0% 59.3% 35.3% 41.4% 0.0% 49.5% 29.6% 2007 17/17 3.6 2.9 61.0% 68.4% 39.1% 41.4% 29.0% 57.0% 34.0%
29 2008 20/21 4.6 1.7 60.8% 68.3% 48.5% 58.7% 29.8% 60.7% 32.9% 2008 3/3 6.3 5.0 47.9% 69.6% 49.2% 71.6% 27.8% 59.6% 32.5%
30 2009 18/18 5.4 2.9 59.6% 68.5% 50.4% 53.1% 45.6% 61.3% 30.7% 2009 23/23 4.7 4.6 54.2% 71.5% 41.1% 48.2% 39.7% 57.5% 32.6%
31 2010 12/12 5.3 2.3 59.2% 68.8% 40.5% 54.2% 48.6% 56.6% 32.0% 2010 4/4 3.5 4.3 53.7% 72.6% 43.1% 61.9% 12.1% 59.0% 33.9%
32 2011 3/3 0.0 1.0 63.2% 39.2% 22.9% 20.0% 25.0% 32.7% 29.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 83/84 4.3 2.1 61.4% 65.2% 45.5% 51.9% 42.3% 57.7% 32.5% — 122/141 4.9 3.4 58.2% 69.6% 45.1% 53.0% 38.0% 59.4% 34.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marcos Daniel Kevin Kim
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1486 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.33 — — — +0.03
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1469 96.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.20 — — — -0.04
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1425 106.2 — — — — +31 — — 36.8% -1.00 1–3 (25%) — — +0.39
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1392 103.2 — — — — +58 — — 33.3% -0.89 0–1 — — +0.28
23 2002 1485 92.6 -1.32 -3.35 0.682 45.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.18 2002 1430 106.3 — — — — +23 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.20
24 2003 1505 109.2 -2.90 -0.82 0.787 46.9% — — — 36.4% -0.82 0–1 1–1 — -0.36 2003 1453 101.1 -1.94 -2.05 1.009 48.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.08
25 2004 1500 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1550 107.7 -1.03 +1.02 0.909 47.9% -39 — — 36.4% -1.18 — — — -0.18
26 2005 1521 115.5 +1.61 +4.56 0.637 44.2% — — — 0.0% -2.60 — 0–2 — -0.44 2005 1562 124.4 -1.57 -1.25 0.924 48.7% +17 -35 -52 44.2% -0.30 7–7 (50%) 8–14 (36%) — +1.98
27 2006 1445 121.5 -3.69 -2.29 0.809 46.3% -8 +103 — 31.9% -1.11 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.06 2006 1546 126.0 -2.01 -0.63 0.882 47.5% -14 +9 — 34.9% -0.95 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.13
28 2007 1518 113.4 -0.91 -2.00 0.586 38.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.09 2007 1484 113.2 -4.48 -1.97 0.789 45.2% +39 — — 23.8% -1.50 2–2 (50%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.68
29 2008 1510 113.6 -1.79 -3.23 0.835 47.0% -113 +95 — 31.9% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.25 2008 1517 103.8 -0.92 +0.78 0.805 46.6% — — — 12.5% -1.38 — — — -0.04
30 2009 1602 132.8 -1.64 -3.70 0.794 46.6% -199 +110 — 31.7% -1.20 1–1 4–1 (80%) — -0.60 2009 1599 124.8 -3.91 -1.54 0.767 45.5% +20 -104 -33 25.5% -1.45 2–2 (50%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.72
31 2010 1499 111.5 -3.07 -3.09 0.739 45.5% -106 +119 -65 26.7% -1.43 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.32 2010 1581 108.5 -1.08 -1.69 0.826 46.6% +31 — — 25.0% -1.38 — 0–1 — +0.11
32 2011 1485 99.5 -5.19 -0.62 0.441 32.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.23 2011 1553 102.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1546 104.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1535 99.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1646 121.4 -2.49 -2.65 0.767 45.7% -111 +104 -65 29.1% -1.30 3–12 (20%) 11–11 (50%) 94.2 -1.01 — 1642 118.6 -2.46 -1.16 0.859 47.2% +15 -38 -43 34.1% -0.93 14–21 (40%) 11–27 (29%) 90.4 +2.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.